Mealey's California Section 17200

  • July 17, 2024

    Judge Won’t Freeze Assets Of Electronics Company Accused Of Faking Online Reviews

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A California federal judge on July 16 denied a consumer’s motion for a preliminary injunction freezing more than $5 million of a Chinese manufacturer-owned company’s assets pending the outcome of his lawsuit accusing it of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other statutes for allegedly faking reviews on Amazon.com to sell shoddy electronics, finding insufficient evidence of damages.

  • July 17, 2024

    Judge Dismisses BetterHelp Customers’ Data Privacy Claims With Leave To Amend

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge granted in part and denied in part an online therapy company’s motion to dismiss consolidated class action claims that it violated California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and several other statutes by failing to adequately protect customers’ personal data, finding certain claims insufficiently pleaded but granting the plaintiffs leave to amend.

  • July 15, 2024

    Judge Blocks Foreclosure Sale After Borrowers Not Contacted For 19 Years

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on July 12 issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) sought by two borrowers enjoining a foreclosure sale of their San Bernardino County property after finding the borrowers likely to prevail on their claim for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) against their mortgage servicer, trustee and affiliated entities based on evidence that they sought foreclosure after not contacting the borrowers for 19 years.

  • July 15, 2024

    9th Circuit Affirms Remand Of Data-Sharing Class Claims Against Medical Center

    PASADENA, Calif. — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel affirmed a judge’s ruling remanding putative class action claims for invasion of privacy and violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) against a health care provider based on its usage of various tracking tools in its website and app, finding that federal directives regarding online patient access do not create “federal officer jurisdiction.”

  • July 12, 2024

    On Remand, Judge Dismisses Kids’ Privacy Claims Against YouTube, Google

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A California federal magistrate judge court granted YouTube LLC, Google LLC and several YouTube kids’ channel-operators’ motion to dismiss minor plaintiffs’ putative class claims for violating their privacy and consumer protection statutes, including California’s unfair competition law (UCL), by collecting the minors’ personally identifiable information (PII).

  • July 12, 2024

    Bank Customer’s Claims For Unfair Autopay Practices May Proceed, Judge Says

    SAN DIEGO — A California federal judge granted in part and denied in part a motion for judgment on the pleadings that Bank of America Corp. filed in response to a customer’s putative class complaint accusing it of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by not notifying him that his automatic payments would be disabled due to account inactivity, allegedly causing his accounts to go overdue and harming his credit score.

  • July 12, 2024

    Federal Judge Refuses To Dismiss Coverage Dispute Over False Advertising Claims

    LOS ANGELES — A federal judge in California denied a professional liability insurer’s motion to dismiss insureds’ breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit seeking coverage for an underlying putative class action alleging that they falsely advertised a penis enlargement device, finding that the court is unable to determine as a matter of law that the insureds’ alleged statements and omissions fail to arise out of work performed by the insureds that involves “specialized training, knowledge and skill in the pursuit of urology, including surgery.”

  • July 12, 2024

    Anonymous Messaging App And Founders Must Pay $5M, Ban Minors Under Consent Order

    LOS ANGELES — The Federal Trade Commission and the state of California jointly filed a consent order in California federal court with a company that operates an anonymous messaging app and two of its founders requiring the defendants to pay $5 million and permanently enjoining the company from allowing minors to use its app, resolving claims that the company violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws.

  • July 11, 2024

    Judge Dismisses Suit Accusing Plant Butter Seller Of Deceptive Avocado Oil Claims

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge dismissed two consumers’ putative class action claims against a company that sells plant butter for violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by allegedly misrepresenting its products as made primarily with avocado oil after finding that the products’ labels would not deceive a reasonable consumer.

  • July 10, 2024

    UPS Granted Summary Judgment In Workers’ ‘Dead End’ Jobs Suit

    OAKLAND, Calif. — A federal judge in California granted summary judgment to United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS) in a case by three female workers who alleged that they were relegated to work in the back and “dead end” job opportunities due to their gender, age and disabilities, finding in part that the workers were not “diligent in their discovery” and failed to present sufficient evidence of their claims.

  • July 09, 2024

    Split 9th Circuit Panel Reverses Dismissal Of UCL Claim In Baby Food Case

    PHOENIX — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel affirmed in part and reversed in part the dismissal of a couple’s putative class action lawsuit against a baby food maker for deceptively labeling its baby food pouches in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws, with one judge dissenting from the panel’s finding that federal law does not preempt the couple’s labeling requirement argument.

  • June 28, 2024

    COMMENTARY: Courts Must, As Recently Reminded, Follow The Law In Rule 702 Expert Testimony Determinations

    By Erin Sheley

  • June 27, 2024

    On Remand, Judge Dismisses Ski Resort Passholders’ COVID-19 Closure Claims

    DENVER — On remand from the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, a Colorado federal judge again dismissed season passholders’ lawsuit against ski resort owners for refusing to refund their purchases after abruptly ending the season due to COVID-19, finding that the resorts’ contracts with passholders prohibited refunds and the passholders failed to plead a violation of various states’ consumer protection laws, including California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • June 26, 2024

    $7.25 Million Settlement Of Lincare Data Breach Receives Final Approval

    TAMPA, Fla. — Two years after Lincare Holdings Inc. was first hit with class claims over a data breach that it experienced in 2021, a Florida federal magistrate judge granted final approval to a settlement with a group of the company’s patients that will provide $7.25 million to cover class members’ claims, attorney fees and other costs and relief.

  • June 25, 2024

    9th Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Deceptive Labeling Claims Against Chocolate Maker

    SAN FRANCISCO — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on June 24 affirmed for different reasons a district court’s dismissal of a consumer’s putative class action accusing a chocolate product manufacturer of deceptively labeling its products in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL), finding that the manufacturer did not as alleged misrepresent its products as not sourced from farms that contribute to deforestation or use child labor.

  • June 24, 2024

    High Court Again Extends Response Deadline In Review Of 9th Circuit FCA Reversal

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on June 21 granted a district court qui tam plaintiff’s second request for additional time to respond to pharmaceutical companies’ petition that seeks review of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling reversing the district court’s dismissal of a suit accusing the companies of violating the False Claims Act (FCA) by artificially inflating drug prices.

  • June 24, 2024

    Judge Won’t Dismiss Hunter Biden’s Lawsuit Against Poster Of Laptop Files

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge denied an activist and his organization’s motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought against them by the son of President Joseph R. Biden for allegedly violating computer fraud laws and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by posting data from his personal electronic devices online and creating a searchable database of its content.

  • June 21, 2024

    Stalking Victims Defend UCL Claims Against Apple Over AirTag Use

    SAN FRANCISCO — A group of putative class plaintiffs who claim that Apple Inc.’s “AirTag” tracking devices were used to stalk them oppose Apple Inc.’s motion to dismiss their second amended complaint (SAC), asserting that they have cured pleading deficiencies identified by a California federal court and have sufficiently alleged injury under California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and established that California law applies to both in-state and out-of-state plaintiffs.

  • June 21, 2024

    California Urges High Court To Not Review Arbitrability Of Uber, Lyft Wage Claims

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — California on June 20 filed a brief to the U.S. Supreme Court opposing petitions for writs of certiorari filed by Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc., arguing that a state appellate court properly affirmed the denial of Uber and Lyft’s attempt to compel arbitration of state officials’ lawsuits against them for allegedly misclassifying drivers in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • June 21, 2024

    Judge Allows Minors’ Data Collection Claims Against Google And Subsidiaries

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge denied Google LLC and its advertising subsidiaries’ motion to dismiss a nationwide putative class action brought against them by minors for collecting their personal data before the age of 13 in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other states’ consumer protection laws.

  • June 21, 2024

    Revised $195,000 Class Deal Gets Initial OK In Suit Alleging Fraudulent Policies

    SANTA ANA, Calif. — Ruling various revisions sufficient, a California federal judge granted preliminary approval to a $195,000 settlement in a suit over alleged fraud involving captive reinsurance, also modifying the preliminarily certified settlement class.

  • June 20, 2024

    Mortgage Discrimination Case Against Navy Federal Credit Union Partially Dismissed

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. — A Virginia federal judge has granted partial dismissal of a racial discrimination loan case against the Navy Federal Credit Unition by nine individuals and struck their motion to certify the case as a class action.

  • June 19, 2024

    JPMDL To Mull Consolidation Of Cases Alleging Benzene In Acne Products

    WASHINGTON, D.C.  — The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPMDL) will meet in Portland, Maine, on July 25 to decide whether to consolidate for pretrial purposes cases that allege that users of benzoyl peroxide (BPO) products for the treatment of acne vulgaris, including creams, washes, scrubs and bars, were inadequately warned about the presence of benzene.

  • June 19, 2024

    California Class Complaint Accuses Apple Of Paying Women Less Than Men

    SAN FRANCISCO — Apple Inc. “systematically” pays females employees lower wages than similarly situated male employees, a putative class complaint filed in a California court by two female employees alleges.

  • June 18, 2024

    Counterclaims Tossed In California Patent Row Over Chipmaking Robots

    SAN FRANCISCO — An automation company accused of infringing five reissue patents for chipmaking robots saw its counterclaim for inequitable conduct dismissed, with a federal judge in California rejecting arguments that during patent prosecution an industry standard was purposely withheld from the examiner when the same standard is identified in the specification of the parent patent.