Mealey's Coronavirus
-
February 06, 2025
Workers: 1 Class Properly Certified, 3 Others Should Be Too In Vaccine Mandate Case
NEW ORLEANS — A trial court properly certified a class of customer-facing workers who sought religious accommodations from United Airlines Inc.’s COVID-19 vaccine policy and were place on unpaid leave for an indefinite amount of time, but the court erred by leaving certain workers outside of the certified class and by denying certification of three other proposed classes, United Airlines workers argue in an appellee/cross-appellant brief filed in the Fifth Circuit U.S Court of Appeals.
-
February 05, 2025
Debtor Claiming Dinged Credit From COVID Accommodation Seeks Remand To State Court
RALEIGH, N.C. — One day after a credit reporting agency filed a notice in a North Carolina federal court stating that it and a borrower had reached a settlement of all of the borrower’s claims against the agency, including violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the borrower on Feb. 4 moved the court to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for remand to state court.
-
February 05, 2025
City Employees Failed To Identify Fundamental Rights Violated By Vaccine Mandate
SEATTLE — A Washington federal court granted the motion to dismiss of a city and its mayor and dismissed with prejudice a lawsuit by several employees who were terminated after they refused to become vaccinated for COVID-19, concluding that the employees were unable to establish that they experienced a violation of any fundamental rights that would create a cause of action against the city.
-
February 05, 2025
Federal Judge Won’t Reconsider Summary Judgment Ruling In Vaccine Mandate Case
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A federal judge in Missouri denied an employer’s request that she reconsider a summary judgment ruling that allows two workers who were fired for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine to proceed with a religious discrimination failure-to-accommodate claim brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and a portion of a religious discrimination claim brought under state law, opining that questions of fact remain as to the issue of undue hardship.
-
February 04, 2025
7th Circuit: Woman Fired Over Vaccine Owes Legal Fees After Arbitration Challenge
CHICAGO — A Seventh Circuit panel affirmed a trial court’s referral to arbitration and dismissal of a complaint by a former employee of a health care software company who alleges that she was illegally terminated for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine and awarded sanctions for the employee’s “uniformly frivolous” objections to arbitration but also noted that the lower court should have stayed the case instead of dismissing it.
-
February 04, 2025
Damaged Credit Suit Stemming From Alleged Misreport Of COVID Accommodation Settles
RALEIGH, N.C. — A credit reporting agency on Feb. 3 filed a notice of settlement in a North Carolina federal court stating that it and a borrower had reached a settlement of all of the borrower’s claims against the agency, which included allegations of violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) after the borrower received an accommodation on an auto loan during the COVID-19 pandemic and expected his account to be reported as current.
-
February 03, 2025
Transit Employees Who Won $7.8M For COVID-19 Vaccine Refusal Firings Cross-Appeal
SAN FRANCISCO — Former employees of a state transit agency on Jan. 31 filed a notice of cross-appeal to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals seeking review of a California federal court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the agency on the employees’ First Amendment free exercise claim, as well as the court’s final pretrial order, after a jury awarded the employees more than $1 million each for the agency’s failure to accommodate their religious objections to being vaccinated for COVID-19.
-
January 31, 2025
California Transit Agency Seeks Stay Of $7.8M Judgment Against It Pending Appeal
SAN FRANCISCO — A state transit agency on Jan. 30 moved a California federal court for stay of enforcement of judgment pending appeal after seeking review by the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals of the lower court’s decision denying its motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial in the wake of a California federal jury’s award to six former employees of more than $1 million each for failing to accommodate their religious objections to being vaccinated for COVID-19.
-
January 30, 2025
Lab Seeking COVID-19 Testing Repayment Adequately Pleads Derivative ERISA Standing
NEWARK, N.J. — Concluding that a medical testing laboratory had obtained derivative standing under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act via assignments of rights by ERISA-governed plan beneficiaries to sue health insurers for reimbursement for COVID-19 testing, a New Jersey federal judge on Jan. 29 denied in part the insurers’ motion to dismiss, while dismissing state law claims and claims based on assignments of rights that were executed after the litigation began.
-
January 30, 2025
Federal Judge Approves Catholic University’s $2M Pandemic Closure Settlement
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal judge in the District of Columbia issued two orders, one granting final approval of a $2 million class settlement to be paid by The Catholic University of America to end a student’s claims over the school’s closure during the start of the coronavirus pandemic and the second awarding class counsel $666,666.66 in attorney fees and $132,048.14 in costs and the class representative $7,500 for a service award.
-
January 29, 2025
Panel Reverses Judgment In Baylor College Of Medicine’s Favor In COVID-19 Dispute
HOUSTON — Noting an issue of first impression, a Texas appeals court concluded Jan. 28 that the presence of COVID-19 at the Baylor College of Medicine did not cause “direct physical loss of or damage to” to the insured’s property and reversed a lower court’s judgment following a jury verdict in favor of the insured.
-
January 29, 2025
Pennsylvania Court Affirms Dismissal Of All Claims In Coronavirus Coverage Suit
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Reconsidering its previous ruling on remand in light of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Ungarean v. CNA & Valley Forge Ins. Co., a Pennsylvania court affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of all claims brought by an insured in a coronavirus coverage dispute.
-
January 27, 2025
1st Circuit Revives Religious Discrimination Claims Over COVID-19 Vaccine Firing
BOSTON — A woman who was terminated from her job at a global biopharmaceuticals company for not getting the COVID-19 vaccine stating that it went against her “personal, private and sincerely held religious beliefs” may still have grounds to sue her employer for religious discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the corresponding Massachusetts state law after a panel of the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals partially reversed the lower court’s dismissal of her claims.
-
January 24, 2025
New Jersey State Officials Have Qualified Immunity For Orders Addressing COVID-19
CAMDEN, N.J. — Concluding that that they were entitled to qualified immunity in their handling of the COVID-19 pandemic with respect to nursing homes, a New Jersey federal court granted a motion to dismiss by New Jersey’s governor and public health commissioner in a lawsuit by survivors of former nursing home residents who died from COVID-19.
-
January 24, 2025
Panel Partly Reverses Ruling In Retirement Facilities’ Coronavirus Coverage Suit
CHICAGO — An Illinois appellate court panel reversed a lower court’s dismissal of insureds’ claim against one insurer in their lawsuit seeking “Contaminated Food/Communicable Disease Coverage,” finding that the application of the policy’s “Pathogenic or Poisonous or Chemical Materials” exclusion “would completely eviscerate that coverage and render it illusory,” but otherwise affirmed the lower court’s ruling in the insureds’ lawsuit prompted by the losses incurred by their continuing care retirement facilities following the COVID-19 outbreak.
-
January 24, 2025
Federal Court Dismisses Hospital’s Coronavirus Coverage Suit Following Settlement
BOSTON — A Massachusetts federal court dismissed without prejudice a hospital insured’s breach of contract lawsuit seeking coverage for its losses arising from the COVID-19 pandemic after the insured and its commercial property insurer announced that they reached a settlement.
-
January 23, 2025
1st Circuit Panel Upholds Firing For COVID-19 Refusal, But On Different Grounds
BOSTON — While disagreeing with a Massachusetts federal court as to the basis for its decision, a panel of the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of a communications company in a former employee’s lawsuit alleging both disability and religious discrimination in terminating him for his refusal to become vaccinated against COVID-19.
-
January 21, 2025
Former Employee With Long COVID Alleges Her Firing By UPS Violated ADA, FMLA
PORTLAND, Maine — A former employee of a package delivery company filed suit against her former employer, alleging that her termination after developing “long COVID” was a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and state and federal family and medical leave statutes.
-
January 21, 2025
SBA Within Statutory Authority To Set Corporate Limits On PPP Loan Disbursements
CHICAGO — Ruling that the Small Business Administration (SBA) was statutorily authorized to create eligibility limits for Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans, an Illinois federal judge granted the SBA’s motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit by a rehabilitation center seeking PPP loan forgiveness and denied the center’s motion for summary judgment and its motion for an interlocutory order compelling reimbursement of loan funds that were recouped by the government.
-
January 17, 2025
Michigan Jury Awards $133,000 To Employee Fired For Refusing COVID-19 Vaccination
DETROIT — A Michigan federal jury on Jan. 16 awarded $133,000 to a former employee of a resort after determining that his refusal to take the COVID-19 vaccine was based on a sincerely held religious belief and that the resort failed to prove that accommodating the employee’s religious beliefs would have caused it to suffer an undue hardship.
-
January 16, 2025
Supreme Court Declines To Enjoin State Physician COVID-19 Misinformation Policy
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court has denied an application for injunction pending appeal submitted by Washington state doctors and others to prevent the enforcement of state policy prohibiting the dissemination of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation.
-
January 16, 2025
2nd Circuit: No Gender Bias By Trader Joe’s For Pandemic Trip Firing
NEW HAVEN, Conn. — A Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel, in affirming a Connecticut federal judge’s order granting summary judgment, has determined that “no reasonable factfinder could conclude on” the record presented that Trader Joe’s termination of a female employee after she took a vacation out of the country during the escalation of the COVID-19 pandemic following a written warning and negative performance review “was a pretext for sex discrimination or that sex discrimination was an otherwise motivating factor” in the decision.
-
January 15, 2025
Hydroxychloroquine Supplier Denies Its Amended Complaint Prejudices Manufacturer
TRENTON, N.J. — A pharmaceutical supplier on Jan. 14 informed a New Jersey federal court that the striking of its second amended complaint (SAC), filed in connection with its purchase of large quantities of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine phosphate from a manufacturer, is not warranted, maintaining that the SAC neither adds nor removes counts from the proposed version and simply adds facts in support of the counts it was permitted to amend.
-
January 15, 2025
4th Circuit Reverses Dismissal Of Fired Worker’s Religious Bias Vaccine Suit
RICHMOND, Va. — A nurse who alleged religious discrimination and failure to provide reasonable accommodation after her employer denied her request for a religious exemption to its COVID-19 vaccination policy sufficiently alleged that her vaccination beliefs were rooted in her religious beliefs, a Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled, reversing a trial court’s dismissal of the complaint.
-
January 14, 2025
High Court Declines To Review Denial Of Qualified Immunity In Prison COVID-19 Case
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 13 denied the petition for writ of certiorari of prison officials seeking review of a Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals decision reversing a Michigan federal court’s dismissal of a prisoner’s civil rights complaint against the officials stemming from their management of the prison in response to COVID-19.