Newsletter RSS

Mealey's Fracking

  • July 26, 2024

    Court Says Fracking Company Did Not Exhaust Administrative Remedies In Fee Dispute

    HARRISBURG, Pa. — In an unpublished opinion, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has ruled that an energy company did not exhaust its administrative remedies in opposing fees levied on it by the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission (PUC) related to hydraulic fracturing wells, therefore the company’s petition for a judgment declaring that it was not responsible to pay the fees was dismissed.

  • July 25, 2024

    Utah: National Monuments Case Should Be Reopened Or Else State Will Suffer Harm

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The state of Utah has filed a reply brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia arguing that it should reopen a lawsuit that has been stayed for three years pertaining to former President Donald J. Trump’s decision to reduce the size of two national monuments in the state, in part for hydraulic fracturing purposes, because if the stay remains in place, the state will suffer harm.

  • July 12, 2024

    Companies Deny Breach Of Contract Claims Related To Marcellus Shale Operations

    WHEELING, W.Va. — Hydraulic fracturing operators have filed a joint answer in West Virginia federal court denying allegations brought in a complaint filed by a company that holds a lease to oil and gas rights that contends that the companies breached their contract by drilling fracking wells through the subsurface of leaseholder’s property without proper authority.

  • July 12, 2024

    Groups Say Federal Agency’s Approval Of ExxonMobil’s Lease Violated Multiple Laws

    LOS ANGELES — Environmental groups have sued the federal agencies in California federal court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, contending that their approval of ExxonMobil Corp.’s offshore oil and gas drilling lease violates multiple laws because the government’s determination that the lease was in the national interest failed to “failed to consider several highly relevant factors.”

  • July 11, 2024

    Fracking Companies Violated Antitrust Laws By Controlling Oil Production, Man Says

    PORTLAND, Maine — A man has filed a putative class action in Maine federal court against a small group of hydraulic fracturing operators, arguing that they violated federal and state antitrust laws when they conspired to “coordinate, and ultimately constrain, domestic shale oil production” as a means to controlling the price of gasoline and setting it at an “artificially high level.”

  • July 11, 2024

    Fracking Operator Says Appeal Of Injunction In Mineral Rights Dispute Is ‘Unripe’

    CINCINNATI — A hydraulic fracturing company has filed a response brief in the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals contending that it should affirm a lower court’s decision that granted the company a preliminary injunction in a mineral rights dispute because the challenges to the injunction brought by a land management company are “unripe and lack substantive merit.”

  • July 11, 2024

    Fracking Operators Say Permits Complied With NEPA, Agency Used ‘Reasoned Analysis’

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Hydraulic fracturing operators that are intervenor defendants in a dispute over federal fracking permits issued by the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) have filed a reply brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia arguing that it should deny the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, grant the intervenors’ motion for summary judgment and find that the DOI gave “reasoned analysis and responses” and complied with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) when it granted the permits in question.

  • July 11, 2024

    Mineral Rights Owners: Defense Expert Lacks Methodology, Evidence Rules Not Met

    COLUMBUS, Ohio — Mineral rights holders have filed a reply brief in Ohio federal court arguing that it should exclude the testimony of defense expert David M. Posner on grounds that he has “no discernible methodology and a limited factual basis for his opinions” and that the defendants failed to meet their burden of showing that it is more likely than not that Posner’s testimony will be admissible pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702.

  • July 11, 2024

    Split Texas High Court Says Company Failed To Make Fair Offer On Forced Pooling

    AUSTIN, Texas — In a split decision, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that the Texas Railroad Commission’s (RRC) conclusion that an oil and gas company failed to make a fair and reasonable offer to voluntarily pool mineral resources was “reasonable.”  The dissenting justices said the company did in fact make a fair offer.

  • July 11, 2024

    Putative Class Says Fracking Operator Contaminated Their Drinking Water

    PITTSBURGH — A group of residents have filed a putative class action against a hydraulic fracturing operator arguing that their water supply has been contaminated by fracking waste fluid that was released into the environment when an incident at a well caused a geyser to erupt and the leaked fluid got into a local aquifer.

  • July 09, 2024

    Companies: Groups Cannot Use ‘Gimmicks’ To Create Standing In Fracking Permit Case

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Intervenors on July 8 filed a joint brief in the District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals arguing that environmental groups that challenge federal hydraulic fracturing permits issued by the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) pertaining to New Mexico’s Permian Basin and Wyoming’s Powder River Basin lack standing to bring their case because Article III of the U.S. Constitution “does not allow pleading gimmicks designed to circumvent the fundamental requirements of a concrete, particularized injury-in-fact traceable to each challenged agency action and redressable by the court.”

  • July 09, 2024

    Landowners: Fracking Operators Improperly Deducted Expenses From Royalty Payments

    LISBON, Ohio — A group of landowners have sued hydraulic fracturing companies in Ohio state court contending that they improperly deducted “post-production” expenses from royalty payments they owed on operations in the mineral estate the companies leased from the plaintiffs located in the Utica Shale play.

  • July 03, 2024

    Judge Allows Discovery To Be Reopened Before Trial In Groundwater Pollution Case

    OKLAHOMA CITY — A federal judge in Oklahoma has ruled that an oil and gas exploration company that is a defendant in a groundwater contamination case may reopen discovery for the limited purpose of inspecting specific items on the plaintiffs’ property before trial because the plaintiffs will “face no undue or unfair prejudice” as a result.

  • June 28, 2024

    COMMENTARY: Courts Must, As Recently Reminded, Follow The Law In Rule 702 Expert Testimony Determinations

    By Erin Sheley

  • July 01, 2024

    Putative Class Seeks Damages For Energy Companies’ Alleged Gas Price Conspiracy

    ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — Residents and companies have filed a putative class action in New Mexico federal court contending that energy companies violated the Sherman Act by conspiring to “coordinate, and ultimately constrain, domestic shale oil production, which has had the purpose and effect of fixing, raising, and maintaining the price of crude oil in and throughout the United States, and worldwide.”

  • June 28, 2024

    High Court Overrules Chevron Deference, Changes Standard For Regulatory Review

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on June 28 voted 6-3 to overrule the doctrine of Chevron deference as incompatible with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in two cases arising out of federal fishing regulations, changing governing precedent for federal courts reviewing agencies’ regulatory actions.

  • June 24, 2024

    U.S. High Court Grants Petition In Fracking Railway Case On Scope Of NEPA

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on June 24 granted review of a lawsuit in which an infrastructure coalition argues that the Surface Transportation Board (STB) failed to adequately examine the risk of wildfires and the impact on groundwater posed by the construction of a proposed rail line in Utah that would carry products related to hydraulic fracturing to and from the shale formation in the Uinta Basin.  The coalition asked the justices to address the proper scope of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

  • June 19, 2024

    Fracking Operators Say Mineral Rights Case Fails, Dispute Shale Plays’ Boundaries

    COLUMBUS, Ohio — Hydraulic fracturing operators that dispute the boundaries of the shale formation at the heart of a mineral rights case on June 18 moved in Ohio federal court to dismiss the lawsuit on grounds that the claims against them fail because they are barred by the statute of limitations and because the defendants “never entered one tract of Plaintiff’s property” and, therefore, there can be no trespass.

  • June 18, 2024

    Agencies Oppose Utah’s Bid To Reopen National Monuments Case After 3-Year Stay

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Federal defendants filed a response brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia opposing a motion by Utah to reopen a lawsuit that has been stayed for three years pertaining to former President Donald J. Trump’s decision to reduce the size of two national monuments in the state, in part for hydraulic fracturing purposes.  The defendants argue that the state is taking conflicting positions in two cases and should not be permitted to reopen the case at hand for the purpose of lifting the stay and filing a motion to dismiss.

  • June 18, 2024

    Native American Councils Say Fracking Lease Cancellation Was Lawful

    ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Three Native American governing bodies that are intervenor defendants in a federal hydraulic fracturing lease dispute have filed a response brief in Alaska federal court arguing that the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) and others exercised their authority lawfully when they canceled fracking leases because the leases were issued “based on the agencies’ legally deficient process.”

  • June 07, 2024

    Oil Company: Agency Exceeded Authority In Requiring Permit For Fracking Well

    DENVER — An oil company and its affiliate have filed a reply brief in the 10th Circuit U.S Court of Appeals arguing that it should rule that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) decision requiring them to file a federal application for permit to drill (APD) for a traversing well exceeded its statutory authority.

  • June 06, 2024

    Texas Panel Reverses, Says 1955 Deed Conveys Floating, Not Fixed Royalty Interest

    EL PASO, Texas — A Texas appellate panel has ruled in favor of a group of mineral rights owners, declaring that a 1955 deed conveyed a floating 1/4 nonparticipating royalty interest in a particular piece of property in Reeves County, Texas, contrary to the competing claims of other parties who said the deed in question conveyed a fixed 1/32 nonparticipating royalty interest.

  • June 06, 2024

    Plaintiffs: Oil Companies Conspired To Fix Gasoline Prices, Violated Sherman Act

    ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A construction company and other parties sued numerous oil and gas companies in New Mexico federal court contending that they have violated the Sherman Act and state antitrust and consumer protection laws by conspiring to “coordinate, and ultimately constrain domestic shale oil production, which has had the effect of fixing, raising, and maintaining the price of retail gasoline” throughout the country.

  • June 06, 2024

    Texas Panel Reverses Immunity Ruling Related To City’s Drilling Permit Decision

    FORT WORTH, Texas — A Texas appellate panel has reversed a lower court’s ruling that held that the city of Arlington and associated parties had governmental immunity from a lawsuit about a hydraulic fracturing drilling permit, but it affirmed the lower court’s decision denying an anti-fracking group’s application for a temporary injunction.

  • June 06, 2024

    Judge Says Landowners’ Appeal Lacks Merit In Dispute Over Mineral, Surface Rights

    COLUMBUS, Ohio — A federal judge in Ohio has refused to stay a preliminary injunction in a mineral rights dispute, ruling that a land management company does not have a strong likelihood of success on the merits of its appeal of a district court’s ruling that a hydraulic fracturing company’s proposed use of surface land gives due regard to the land management company’s use of the surface land.