Mealey's Intellectual Property
-
November 21, 2025
Federal Circuit: Wrong Construction Of Bot Detection Claim Leads To PTAB Reversal
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Nov. 20 held that the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) wrongly construed the claim term “acquiring interest data” when considering the patentability of a claim phrase in a patent describing a system to determine if a computer is being used by a human or a “bot”; under the correct construction, the panel held that the claim is anticipated by a prior art reference.
-
November 21, 2025
No Attorney Fees To Sports Medicine Company Cleared Of Infringement
TAMPA, Fla. — A federal judge in Florida denied a plaintiff sports medicine company’s motion for attorney fees, holding that its trademark dispute with another sports medicine company was not “exceptional” as defined in the Lanham Act despite the judge’s earlier grant of summary judgment in the plaintiff’s favor that led to an order canceling the defendant entity’s federally registered trademark.
-
November 20, 2025
Federal Circuit: Claim Construction Correct In Railcar Patent Row
WASHINGTON, D.C. — An Oregon federal magistrate judge properly granted summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of defendant railcar manufacturers in a dispute over patents related to railroad gondola cars because the accused cars lacked a required “floor panel extension” as defined by the patents, a Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held Nov. 19.
-
November 20, 2025
Judge: Designer Not Barred From Seeking Statutory Damages, Fees In IP Case
PHILADELPHIA — A Pennsylvania federal judge held that a plaintiff designer is not barred from seeking damages and fees against a clothing company that contracted with another designer to use a pattern that allegedly infringed the plaintiff’s copyrighted design, finding that a four-year gap between the defendant designer’s alleged infringement and the clothing company’s use of the pattern on pajamas constituted separate acts of alleged infringement after a substantial cessation.
-
November 20, 2025
Judge Relates Suits Alleging Salesforce Pirated AI Training Material
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California granted a joint stipulation relating two actions accusing Salesforce Inc. of pirating copyrighted books to train its artificial intelligence.
-
November 20, 2025
IT Company: Fracking Proppant Supplier Misappropriated Trade Secrets And Software
FORT WORTH, Texas — An IT services company has sued an energy company in Texas federal court alleging that it misappropriated trade secrets when it misused login credentials related to proprietary software code that the IT company created and managed for the energy company’s operations as a provider of proppants to the hydraulic fracturing industry.
-
November 20, 2025
Campbell’s, Candidate For Congress Settle Suit Over Can Marks Use
ANN ARBOR, Mich. — A candidate for Congress seeking to represent parts of Detroit and The Campbell’s Soup Co. settled their trademark dispute in a Michigan federal court, with the candidate agreeing to remove from her social media images that referenced the company’s soup can; the candidate had argued that her use of the can design was a parodic reference to her own last name.
-
November 18, 2025
Federal Circuit Points To Weakness Of Claims In Affirming Patent Row Fees
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel affirmed a Tennessee federal judge’s decision to grant more than $100,000 in attorney fees to a small grocery chain, finding no abuse of discretion in the judge’s finding that a plaintiff security technology company had a pattern of bringing frivolous patent infringement claims.
-
November 18, 2025
Judge Used Wrong Standard To Exclude Patent Evidence, Federal Circuit Says
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held that a new trial is needed on damages in a dispute over a patent describing a type of self-balancing unicycle, agreeing with the defendant-appellant companies that a Washington federal judge wrongly excluded evidence of noninfringing substitutes.
-
November 18, 2025
4th Circuit Affirms Va. Federal Judge’s Dismissal Of Car Photo Copyright Action
RICHMOND, Va. — While a Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel agreed that a Virginia federal court, and not one in California, was the proper venue to consider copyright claims involving stock images of vehicles due to a forum selection clause in a contract, the panel also affirmed a Virginia federal judge’s decision to decline to exercise jurisdiction over a declaratory judgment action brought by a software company named as a defendant in an infringement suit filed in the California federal court.
-
November 17, 2025
Canadian AI Company Must Face Copyright Claims, Federal Judge Says
NEW YORK — Canadian artificial intelligence company Cohere Inc. must face news publishers’ allegations that its Command product outputs copyrighted works and misattributes trademarks, a federal judge in New York said in denying a motion for partial dismissal.
-
November 17, 2025
Supreme Court Rejects Cases Asking If PTAB Can Review Expired Patents
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Nov. 17 rejected a patent-holding company’s petitions for writs of certiorari in disputes with Apple Inc., Google LLC, LG Electronics Inc. and an affiliate over multiple technology patents, declining to take up the company’s arguments regarding the constitutionality of inter partes review (IPR) proceedings before the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).
-
November 17, 2025
DISH Wins Nearly $42M In Default Judgment Against Pirate Server Host
SEATTLE — A federal judge in Washington granted DISH Network LLC’s motion for default judgment against a Ukrainian company it accused of vicariously contributing to piracy, entering nearly $42 million in statutory damages against the company and its chief executive officer, along with a permanent injunction for willful infringement.
-
November 14, 2025
Federal Circuit Undoes Infringement Findings For School Bus Sign Patents
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal judge in Michigan wrongly construed the term “transparency” in an infringement dispute concerning patents related to a school bus sign, and it was unreasonable for a jury to find infringement under the doctrine of equivalents, a Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held Nov. 13; the panel reversed an infringement judgment as to one of the patents and vacated the infringement finding as to the other.
-
November 14, 2025
11th Circuit: Edible Arrangements’ Prior Claims Don’t Bar New IP Suit
ATLANTA — An 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel reversed a Georgia federal judge’s grant of summary judgment in favor of 1-800-Flowers.com Inc. in a trademark dispute brought by competitor Edible Arrangements LLC, finding that the appellant company’s most recent trademark infringement claims were not released by a 2016 settlement between the companies.
-
November 14, 2025
OpenAI Must Produce 20 Million Chat Logs, Magistrate Judge Says
SAN FRANCISCO — OpenAI entities must produce 20 million ChatGPT chat logs after a federal magistrate judge in New York said the company never explained why existing protective orders and its own de-identification efforts would not sufficiently protect user privacy.
-
November 14, 2025
Candidate Named Campbell Seeks Dismissal Of Soup Company’s IP Suit
ANN ARBOR, Mich. — A candidate for Congress seeking to represent parts of Detroit is asking a federal judge in Michigan to dismiss a trademark infringement complaint filed against her by The Campbell’s Co. and a related entity, contending that her use of the company’s soup can design on social media is a parodic reference to her own last name; she also seeks the rejection of the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
November 13, 2025
Clerical Error Justifies Judicial Correction Of Patent, Federal Circuit Holds
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Texas federal judge erred in finding that claims in an oil technology company’s patent describing a tool used in oil wells were invalid as indefinite, a Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held Nov. 12; the panel found that the judge was wrong to reject the patent holder’s argument that the representative claim contained a “‘clear clerical’” error that the company argued was obviously corrected elsewhere in the patent in a way that would have been understood by a person of skill in the relevant art.
-
November 13, 2025
Company To Meta: Thousands Of Pornographic Movies Weren’t For Personal Use
SAN FRANCISCO — Thousands of pornographic movies downloaded to 47 internet addresses associated with Meta Platforms Inc. suggest an attempt to conceal the theft of copyrighted material used to train its artificial intelligence rather than personal use, two pornography companies tell a federal judge in California in opposing dismissal of their action.
-
November 13, 2025
Judge Trims Trade Dress Claim From Insurance Platform Copying Suit
NEW YORK — A New York federal judge granted a defendant insurance company’s motion to partially dismiss a plaintiff technology company’s claim of trade dress infringement, agreeing with the insurer that the elements of the claimed trade dress were not adequately described in the technology company’s complaint that alleges “unauthorized cloning” of its online insurance platform.
-
November 13, 2025
Federal Judge: No Preliminary Injunction In Row Over ‘Wild’ Trademarks
NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York denied a preliminary injunction motion from a baby-goods maker that uses the trademark “Wildbird,” finding that the company failed to show it was likely that another baby-goods maker’s use of the marks related to the name “Wildride” would cause confusion among customers.
-
November 12, 2025
Federal Circuit Rejects Bid To Reinstate Patent Verdict Against AT&T, Nokia
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel denied a plaintiff-appellee’s petition for reconsideration of its September decision vacating a jury’s $166 million verdict against AT&T Mobility LLC and Nokia of America Corp. in its favor, rejecting the company’s contention that the panel wrongly read the evidence in the case.
-
November 12, 2025
Entresto Maker Tells Supreme Court Not To Take Up Patent Validity Case
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The owner of the patent for heart medication Entresto tells the U.S. Supreme Court that it should reject a petition for a writ of certiorari from a generic drugmaker, contending that there was no error in the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ reversal of invalidity because its patent was properly enabled.
-
November 12, 2025
Split Federal Circuit Says PTAB Lacked Evidence For Obviousness Finding
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel split in one of two related appeals, upholding some findings by the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that claims in a technology company’s patent describing a biometric payment card security system were unpatentable as obvious but reversing as to other claims; the panel majority wrote that PTAB lacked substantial evidence to support its construction of a disputed claim phrase involving where the described device stores data in memory.
-
November 11, 2025
Altria Says ITC’s Vape Patent Investigation Is Unconstitutional
RICHMOND, Va. — Tobacco company Altria Group Inc., its vape subsidiary NJOY LLC and affiliates filed a complaint in Virginia federal court and a motion seeking to enjoin an International Trade Commission investigation into certain vape products based on a patent-related complaint by Juul Labs Inc. (JLI), writing that the ITC proceeding is unconstitutional and violates the company’s right to a jury trial under SEC v. Jarkesy.