Mealey's Asbestos Bankruptcy

  • November 01, 2024

    Asbestos Bankruptcy Claimants Take Stay Relief Denial Ruling To Fourth Circuit

    CHARLOTTE, N.C. —A federal judge in North Carolina affirmed a bankruptcy court’s decision not to lift the automatic stay for two asbestos cases, agreeing that allowing the cases to proceed in state court could threaten the DBMP LLC bankruptcy process.  The claimants filed a notice of appeal to the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in the wake of the ruling.

  • October 30, 2024

    Arbitration Bid Fought In Reinsurance Billing Row Involving MOU

    LOS ANGELES — Urging a California federal court to reject an arbitration bid in a lawsuit over reinsurance billings arising from asbestos bodily injury claims, an insurer contends that the abstention doctrine doesn’t apply and that the arbitration clause is in a different agreement than the one at issue and doesn’t include the present billing dispute.

  • October 29, 2024

    Day-Late Filing In Asbestos Trust Suit Rejected By Delaware Top Court

    WILMINGTON, Del. — An appeal filed a day late prevents jurisdiction over the case, a defect that cannot be remedied, the Delaware Supreme Court said in dismissing an appeal from a ruling finding that the statute of limitations on a man’s asbestos case began at the time of his autopsy and barred a case against a bankruptcy trust.

  • October 28, 2024

    J&J’s Latest Debtor Opposes Claimant’s Counsel’s Bid For Venue Reconsideration

    HOUSTON — A request by certain asbestos talc claimants’ counsel for reconsideration of an order denying their motion to transfer venue for the Chapter 11 case of the latest Johnson & Johnson (J&J) spinoff, Red River Talc LLC, should be denied because it is based on “the blatantly false allegation” that the debtor and J&J’s previous debtor are the “same entity,” Red River says in an Oct. 25 objection filed in Texas federal bankruptcy court.

  • October 23, 2024

    Receiver, Talc Claimants Seek 3rd Circuit Reversal Of Chapter 11 Dismissal Denial

    PHILADELPHIA — The board of directors of defunct talc supplier Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Inc. (WCD) had no authority to place the company into bankruptcy because its court-appointed receiver has “exclusive authority to manage WCD’s affairs,” the receiver and a committee of asbestos claimants tell the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a consolidated appeal of a New Jersey federal bankruptcy judge’s denial of the receiver’s bid to dismiss the company’s Chapter 11 case.

  • October 22, 2024

    Georgia-Pacific Spinoff’s Committee Gets Amici Backing In Effort To Dismiss Case

    RICHMOND, Va. — The Chapter 11 case of Georgia-Pacific spinoff Bestwall LLC should be dismissed because the protections of bankruptcy are not intended for companies that are not in financial distress, and the civil justice system is well prepared to handle mass tort litigation for asbestos claims when an asbestos trust is not the proper vehicle to handle the claims, as Bestwall asserts, the American Association for Justice and an ad hoc group of other asbestos claimants tell the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in amicus curiae briefs in support of the Official Committee of Asbestos Claimants.

  • October 22, 2024

    Asbestos Claimants Appeal Plan Confirmation For Cosmetics Company Ben Nye

    SAN FRANCISCO — Asbestos plaintiffs and law firms appealed the confirmation of the Chapter 11 Subchapter V plan of reorganization for family-run cosmetics company Ben Nye Co. Inc. to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP), along with the bankruptcy court’s approval of a bar date for filing proofs of claim for asbestos personal injury claims.

  • October 22, 2024

    Virginia Jury Awards $3.45 Million In Millwright Mesothelioma Case

    NEWPORT NEWS, Va. — A Virginia jury awarded the widow of a former millwright who developed fatal mesothelioma after occupational asbestos exposure $3.5 million in her case against John Crane Inc., sources told Mealey Publications.

  • October 21, 2024

    Reinsurers Move To Compel Arbitration In Billings Dispute Involving MOU

    LOS ANGELES — Arguing that a dispute over reinsurance billings arising from asbestos bodily injury claims falls within the scope of the “broad” arbitration agreement in the excess of loss reinsurance treaty at issue, reinsurers in an Oct. 18 motion ask a California federal court to compel arbitration and dismiss or stay the case.

  • October 17, 2024

    New York Justice Denies Dismissal Of Estee Lauder Asbestos Cancer Case

    NEW YORK — A New York state court justice denied a cosmetic company’s motion to dismiss a suit alleging that exposure to asbestos within its talc products led to a woman’s mesothelioma, finding that the statute of limitations began when doctors actually diagnosed the woman and that tolling instituted during the coronavirus pandemic applied.

  • October 16, 2024

    Connecticut Jury Hits J&J Entities With $15 Million Talc Verdict

    BRIDGEPORT, Conn. — A jury in Connecticut on Oct. 15 awarded a man and his wife $15 million in their asbestos-talc suit against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and various related entities and triggered a punitive damages phase that by state law will be decided by the judge in the future, sources told Mealey Publications.

  • October 16, 2024

    Summary Judgment Granted For Guaranty Association In Asbestos Coverage Dispute

    NEW ORLEANS — A Louisiana federal judge granted summary judgment to the Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association (LIGA), the purported statutory obligor for insurance policies issued by a now-insolvent insurer of the defendants sued by a now-deceased man alleging that workplace exposure to asbestos caused his mesothelioma, finding that the wrongful death claims filed by the man’s wife and two daughters are barred by the insurance liquidator’s deadline to file claims.

  • October 15, 2024

    Magistrate Judge Finds Access Paramount, Won’t Seal Asbestos Settlement Documents

    NEW YORK — A federal magistrate judge in New York largely declined to redact names and amounts from documents related to court approval of a $600,000 settlement of asbestos claims against various talc defendants, saying the approval requires consideration of whether the agreement is fair and reasonable and should be available for public consumption and that nothing warrants redacting attorney fee information.

  • October 15, 2024

    9th Circuit Panel Reverses Government Contractor Win For Asbestos Plaintiffs

    SAN FRANCISCO —  A judge erred in granting summary judgment to a family on a government contractor defense in a maritime asbestos case under Boyle v. United Techs., when Yearsley v. W.A. Ross Const. Co. was both cited by the defendant and permits the defense, a panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said in an unpublished opinion reversing.

  • October 14, 2024

    Talc Supplier Presperse Gets Approval For Future Asbestos Claimants’ Representative

    TRENTON, N.J. — The New Jersey federal bankruptcy judge overseeing the new Chapter 11 case of raw materials supplier Presperse Corp. appointed the debtor’s candidate to represent the future holders of asbestos personal injury claims against the company, with no other candidates being proposed and no objections to the appointment filed.

  • October 11, 2024

    Change Of Venue To New Jersey Denied For J&J’s 3rd Spinoff Bankruptcy Case

    HOUSTON — A Texas federal bankruptcy judge on Oct. 10 denied two requests to transfer the new Chapter 11 case of the latest Johnson & Johnson (J&J) spinoff, Red River Talc LLC, to New Jersey where J&J is headquartered and where its previous Chapter 11 attempts for other spinoffs were litigated and eventually dismissed as bad faith filings.

  • October 10, 2024

    Man On Dismissal: Moline Study A Portion Of Talc Case, Doesn’t Call For Discovery

    NEW YORK — Courts strongly favor granting voluntary dismissals with prejudice as precedent cited by both parties shows, and dismissal would leave no basis or need for ongoing discovery, an asbestos plaintiff tells a federal judge in New York in an Oct. 9 reply brief rebutting claims that his motion to dismiss his case was a bad faith effort to avoid discovery.

  • October 09, 2024

    New York Court: No Privacy Protections For Asbestos Expert’s Talc Study Subjects

    NEW YORK — The subjects of research papers on the connection between cosmetic talc and mesothelioma are clearly relevant to personal injury actions, and because the subjects were never treated by or patients of the researchers, they are not protected by federal health privacy law, a panel of the First Department New York Supreme Court Appellate Division said Oct. 8.

  • October 07, 2024

    Law Firm Opposes Disclosure Statement, Trust For Talc Debtors Imerys, Cyprus

    WILMINGTON, Del. — The disclosure statement for the reorganization plan of Chapter 11 asbestos talc debtor Imerys Talc America Inc. and affiliates should be rejected because their proposed 60/40 split of nearly $1 billion in asbestos trust funding into “sub-funds” for ovarian cancer claimants and mesothelioma claimants makes the plan “patently unconfirmable,” a plaintiffs’ law firm says in its objection to the statement filed Oct. 4 in Delaware federal bankruptcy court.

  • October 04, 2024

    Pittsburgh Jury’s $1.5M In Punitive Damages Brings Asbestos Verdict To $3.8M

    PITTSBURGH — A Pennsylvania jury awarded a couple $3.8 million, including $1.5 million in punitive damages, for the husband’s mesothelioma and found Foster Wheeler LLC 100% liable.

  • October 04, 2024

    J&J’s 3rd Bankruptcy Attempt Triggers More Briefing On Talc Firm’s Role

    TRENTON, N.J. — A bankruptcy stay does not apply to an effort at removing a law firm from the asbestos-talc Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee (PSC), Johnson & Johnson argues in a second motion to remove and related letter briefs filed in a federal court in New Jersey claiming that in a “severe breach of trust,” the firm voted against the bankruptcy plan without the client authority to do so.  But in its own filing, the firm tells the court that the stay imposed by the bankruptcy of the Johnson & Johnson entity should apply and calls the company’s position “highly suspect” given that a state court judge already found no reason to remove the firm from its role.

  • October 01, 2024

    Appeal Of Venue Ruling For Chapter 11 Talc Debtor Denied Pending Mediation

    HOUSTON — A Texas federal judge on Sept. 30 denied a request by the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in the Chapter 11 case of talc mining company Barretts Minerals Inc. (BMI) to hear an interlocutory appeal of a bankruptcy court’s refusal to transfer the case to Montana, saying the denial is without prejudice to refiling the motion if ongoing mediation to resolve the debtor’s talc liabilities through a consensual plan of reorganization fails.

  • October 01, 2024

    Beasley Allen, Smith Law Talc Firms Sue Each Other, Allege Breach Of Contract

    Two law firms at the center of litigation alleging that consumer talc contains asbestos turned on each other recently, with each suing the other for breach of contract in a pair of federal court lawsuits alleging that financial motives interfered with decision making about Johnson & Johnson’s third attempt at a bankruptcy to resolve the litigation.

  • September 25, 2024

    9th Circuit Affirms Verdict In False Claims Suit Against Asbestos Screener

    MISSOULA, Mont. — A trial court properly denied summary judgment on False Claims Act and statute of limitations grounds to a Libby, Mont., medical screening company and properly instructed the jury about the standard for evaluating allegations that the company submitted claims under a special Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act program for asbestos-exposed Libby residents, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel said in a Sept. 24 unpublished opinion.

  • September 24, 2024

    Revlon Bankruptcy Judge Certifies Talc Claimants’ Appeal For 2nd Circuit Review

    NEW YORK — A New York federal bankruptcy judge on Sept. 23 certified for direct appeal to the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals his recent ruling barring asbestos talc plaintiffs in 42 personal injury lawsuits from pursuing claims against former debtor Revlon Inc. under the discharge and injunction provisions of its confirmed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.