-
March 31, 2026
TRENTON, N.J. — A firm on the asbestos-talc multidistrict litigation steering committee and one of its attorneys asked a federal magistrate judge in New Jersey on March 30 to stay his ruling disqualifying them, arguing that they are likely to prevail on their appeal of a ruling nationalizing a state rule on professional conduct.
-
March 31, 2026
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal judge lifted a ruling staying the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization’s (ADAO) action seeking information on remediation steps taken during the White House East Wing demolition and scheduled briefing on motions for summary judgment after the group complained a stay would leave the case in limbo.
-
March 30, 2026
CHARLOTTE, N.C. — A North Carolina federal bankruptcy judge did not misapply or misinterpret federal law or Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals precedent in denying two asbestos claimants’ motion to dismiss the Chapter 11 case of Georgia-Pacific spinoff Bestwall LLC, a federal judge in the state held March 27 in denying the claimants’ request to certify the decision for direct appeal.
-
March 30, 2026
HOUSTON — A committee of asbestos claimants in the Chapter 11 case of talc mining company BMI Oldco Inc. failed to meet the criteria for an interlocutory appeal of a bankruptcy judge’s denial of the committee’s bid to dismiss the case for lack of financial distress, a Texas federal judge held in denying the committee’s motion for leave to appeal.
-
March 27, 2026
NEW ORLEANS — A shipyard opposed the addition of pre- and postjudgment interest on a $6,625,000 asbestos verdict after previously arguing that it was prejudiced by comments made during the trial and that the plaintiff never established negligence.
-
March 26, 2026
RICHMOND, Va. — The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals granted a request by two insurers of Chapter 11 debtor Hopeman Brothers Inc. to hold in abeyance their appeal of a bankruptcy court’s appointment of a legal representative for future asbestos claimants in the debtor’s case until a Virginia federal court rules on whether to confirm Hopeman’s plan of reorganization.
-
March 24, 2026
NEW YORK — An insurance exchange filed a remand motion in a New York federal court, arguing that its suit seeking to disqualify a reinsurer-appointed arbitrator based on his prior representation presents a noncommercial, nonarbitrable dispute over attorney fiduciary duties that belongs in state court, not federal court.
-
March 24, 2026
LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A duty exists under Kentucky negligence and product liability law to prevent foreseeable household exposures to asbestos that are “regular and repeated,” the Kentucky Supreme Court said in affirming a ruling reversing summary judgment for two defendants in an asbestos case and in finding that a summer job didn’t trigger workers’ compensation system exclusivity.
-
March 24, 2026
LOS ANGELES — Johnson & Johnson (J&J), which is seeking to overturn a $40 million asbestos-talc verdict, asked a California court to revoke pro hac vicestatus of Beasley Allen Law Firm attorneys in coordinated litigation, saying they improperly associated with an attorney who previously worked with J&J. Meanwhile, two bellwether plaintiffs and J&J filed post-trial briefing over whether faulty instructions and juror misconduct produced the verdict and whether one of the plaintiff’s claims was untimely and should never have gone to trial.
-
March 23, 2026
ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. — It would not serve the interests of justice to allow Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles PC to continue participating in the coordinated asbestos-talc litigation after having been disqualified for collaborating with a former Johnson & Johnson attorney who worked on the same litigation, a New Jersey appellate court said in denying a stay of the ruling pending appeal to the state’s top court.
-
March 19, 2026
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A judge properly instructed a jury on the issue of whether an employer’s workers’ compensation insurance covered mesothelioma claims, and an attorney’s testimony explaining why a company would obtain insurance in a state where it had no employees was offered as rebuttal testimony, not expert opinion, a Missouri appeals court held in affirming a defense verdict.
-
March 18, 2026
CHARLOTTE, N.C. — A North Carolina federal bankruptcy judge properly denied an asbestos claimant’s motion for relief from the automatic stay in the Chapter 11 case of Georgia-Pacific spinoff Bestwall LLC, a federal judge ruled in affirming the decision on appeal.
-
March 18, 2026
WILMINGTON, Del. — A $9 million verdict in a case alleging exposure to asbestos in shotgun shell basewads stands after a Delaware judge denied a motion for judgment or new trial, finding that an estate established that the manufacturers could both be liable and should have known of the dangers and that exposure cleared the bar for liability.
-
March 17, 2026
LOS ANGELES — A California judge granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict on a $950 million punitive damages award against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) in an asbestos-talc case, finding that while the plaintiff family members established causation, they had not demonstrated malicious conduct or that J&J had a duty to disclose, adding that the award was also likely inflated by attorney misconduct.
-
March 12, 2026
NEWPORT NEWS, Va. — A federal judge in Virginia said that as a sanction, a jury will be instructed that an expert had a duty to preserve emails between asbestos-talc study collaborators when he destroyed them, but said a motion seeking to compel interrogatory responses about litigation funding is denied for being untimely.
-
March 10, 2026
ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. — The judge overseeing New Jersey multicounty talc litigation declined to stay his ruling disqualifying Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles PC while the firm appeals to the New Jersey Supreme Court a ruling that reversed his original decision finding that their collaboration with a former Johnson & Johnson attorney was not improper.
-
March 10, 2026
WILMINGTON, Del. — Insurers challenging the confirmation of the Chapter 11 plan of liquidation for asbestos talc debtor AIO US Inc. and the plan’s asbestos trust say in their reply brief on appeal in Delaware federal court that the trust and its advisory committee fail in their assertion that the appeal is “equitably moot” because the plan has taken effect.
-
March 09, 2026
RICHMOND, Va. —The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals cleared the way for asbestos claimants to seek rehearing en banc by staying the mandate for a split panel’s decision affirming a North Carolina federal bankruptcy judge’s denial of the claimants’ request to lift the automatic stay in the Chapter 11 case of CertainTeed spinoff DBMP LLC so they could proceed with their state court lawsuits against CertainTeed and nondebtor affiliates.
-
March 06, 2026
PHILADELPHIA — A Pennsylvania jury’s $7,148 award for a woman’s four years of suffering with ovarian cancer as a result of exposure to asbestos-tainted talc as part of its $250,000 verdict “is not a verdict. It is a number that is out of touch with the reality of the suffering,” plaintiffs argue in seeking additur. But in a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV), two Johnson & Johnson entities argue that the plaintiffs had not demonstrated that talc caused her disease, let alone conduct warranting punitive damages.
-
March 04, 2026
SYRACUSE, N.Y. — A New York federal bankruptcy court should approve a request by new Chapter 11 debtor Vanderbilt Minerals LLC to allow a stalking horse bidder and bid procedures for the sale of most of the debtor’s assets over the objections of counsel for asbestos claimants and the U.S. trustee so potential bidders have timely information on the sale, the debtor says in a March 4 reply to the objections.
-
March 04, 2026
TRENTON, N.J. — A New Jersey federal judge hearing a trade libel case filed by Johnson & Johnson (J&J) spinoff Pecos River Talc LLC against the author of a scientific study on asbestos in talc products has granted the spinoff relief from the judge’s dismissal of the suit and allowed it to amend its complaint after the company presented new evidence.
-
March 03, 2026
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The legality of the “Texas Two-Step,” under which large wealthy corporations have used the Lone Star State’s divisional merger laws to create an affiliate and saddle the spinoff with all of the company’s asbestos liabilities, has reached the nation’s top court, with claimants of Georgia-Pacific spinoff Bestwall LLC filing a petition for certiorari to challenge the corporate restructuring maneuver.
-
March 03, 2026
RICHMOND, Va. — A Virginia federal judge granted a debtor insured’s motion to abstain from exercising jurisdiction over an insurer’s adversary proceeding, which seeks a declaration that no additional coverage is owed to the insured for thousands of asbestos liability claims, after determining that questions of state law weigh in favor of abstention.
-
March 03, 2026
CINCINNATI — The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals vacated and remanded a district court’s decision to grant a motion to dismiss an insured’s amended complaint seeking coverage for underlying asbestos liabilities, determining that the insured adequately states a claim for breach of contract.
-
February 26, 2026
WILMINGTON, Del. — Bankruptcy trusts are the only reliable source of claims data, and an equitable bill of discovery permits a ruling preserving the evidence, repeat litigants in asbestos cases tell a Delaware Supreme Court in an appellee brief.