Mealey's Employment
-
February 27, 2026
9th Circuit Vacates Preliminary Injunction In Collective Bargaining EO Case
PASADENA, Calif. — Citing its reasoning in an earlier stay order, including an unlikelihood of success by the challengers of the March executive order (EO), the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 26 vacated a trial court’s preliminary injunction issued in a case by six unions suing over the EO that limited certain federal workers’ rights to organize and bargain collectively.
-
February 27, 2026
Judge Dismisses xAI’s Employee Poaching, Trade Secrets Claims Against OpenAI
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge granted OpenAI Inc.’s motion to dismiss an amended complaint in which xAI accused competitor OpenAI of violating the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) and California’s unfair competition law (UCL), writing that xAI’s allegations relate to the conduct of eight former employees who left for OpenAI but not “any misconduct by OpenAI.”
-
February 25, 2026
Petitions Involving Worker Disclosures, Unions, More Denied By Supreme Court
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court has denied review of cases regarding the use of an “opt-out” procedure for employees in class action suits, whether the federal Age Discrimination Act applies to medical residency, responsibilities of unions to represent employees in termination cases involving hearsay and whether it was right to dismiss a suit against a state law that prohibits retaliation against employees who refuse to attend meetings where religious or political matters are discussed.
-
February 25, 2026
U.S. High Court Won’t Review Jury Verdict For VA On Title VII, Retaliation Claims
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for writ of certiorari filed by a Department of Veterans Affairs pharmacist asking to review an appellate panel’s order affirming a federal Florida District Court jury’s ruling in favor of the VA on Title VII and Civil Rights Act of 1964 claims for further scrutiny of jury instructions and a summary judgment decision based on a prior ruling in the case.
-
February 25, 2026
U.S. High Court: Yearsley Doesn’t Provide Immunity To Federal Contractors
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Yearsley v. W.A. Ross Construction Co. provides federal contractors with a possible merits defense only and not immunity, and so a ruling denying a contractor protection under Yearsley is not immediately appealable, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Feb. 25 in a forced labor class case against the operator of a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) processing center.
-
February 25, 2026
Judge Denies Class Certification In Amazon Wage Suit As 2022 Briefs Are ‘Outdated’
DENVER — A federal judge in Colorado denied a 2022 motion for class certification filed by an Amazon worker who alleges that he and others were incorrectly paid overtime based on a pay rate that did not include holiday incentive pay (HIP), opining that the discussion of superiority is now “outdated” following a ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court in September 2024 that “seemingly resolved the ‘central issue’ of this case.”
-
February 24, 2026
High Court Won’t Hear Speech Protection Case Of Police Chief Axed For Racist Texts
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 23 denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by a fired California city police chief asking the court to settle “an intractable 7-5 circuit split over how courts determine whether speech addresses a matter of public concern” that was exacerbated by the dismissal of her claims of retaliation and conspiracy pursuant to the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that she alleged in a lawsuit filed against her employer after her termination for forwarding reportedly racist text messages.
-
February 24, 2026
High Court Rejects Boeing’s Petition In RLA Preemption Dispute With Pilots Union
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 23 denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by the Boeing Co. asking the court to address whether state law claims brought against third parties that are unable to be resolved without interpreting a collective bargaining agreement between an airline and its workers are preempted by the Railway Labor Act in a dispute with the Southwest Airlines Pilots Association (SWAPA) over statements made regarding the safety and airworthiness of the 737 MAX for inclusion in the union’s agreement.
-
February 24, 2026
Employers To Pay $1.7M In Attorney Fees Over Invasive Application Questions
SAN DIEGO — A California federal judge granted final approval to a settlement of $1 per class member, amounting to approximately $172,000, and granted a motion for attorney fees of $1,775,000 to the plaintiffs’ attorneys to resolve class action claims against multiple employers for requiring job applicants to answer invasive medical inquiries, including when one plaintiff’s last menstrual period was, in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and California’s unfair competition law (UCL).
-
February 24, 2026
Cross-Petitions Denied In Supreme Court FLSA Collective Lawsuit Notices Dispute
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 23 denied cross-petitions for a writ of certiorari filed by Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Inc. and four former food servers regarding a dispute over the standard for federal district courts to authorize and facilitate notices to nonparties on behalf of plaintiffs when joining a lawsuit as a collective pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
-
February 24, 2026
Supreme Court Won’t Review Church Autonomy Decision In Minister Defamation Case
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 23 denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by a former director of a general mission board of a regional cooperative missions and ministry organization seeking a ruling on church autonomy decisions after a Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel majority upheld dismissal of a defamation lawsuit he filed against the North American Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention Inc. (NAMB).
-
February 23, 2026
U.S. Supreme Court Denies Service Members’ 2 Vaccine Mandate Petitions
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 23 denied two petitions filed by members of the U.S. Air Force and Space Force that asked the justices to consider in two class cases whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) allows for their reinstatement following their refusal to get the COVID-19 vaccine to include awards of back pay and retirement points.
-
February 23, 2026
City Waives Response To Officers’ Petition For Review Of COVID Shot Data Suit Toss
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The city of Chicago waived its right to respond to a petition for writ of certiorari filed by current and former police officers asking the U.S. Supreme Court to address a circuit split regarding discovery and determine if a decision in an early 20th century smallpox case “should be limited or overturned in favor of a tiers-of-scrutiny approach in assessing First Amendment religious discrimination claims” in challenging the dismissal of claims that collection of their COVID-19 testing results and vaccination statuses violated federal and state law.
-
February 23, 2026
White Sox, MLB Seek Dismissal Of Former Prospect’s Vaccine-Related Injury Lawsuit
CHICAGO — Contending that it is untimely and suffers from other deficiencies, the Chicago White Sox (CWS) and Major League Baseball moved to dismiss the complaint of a former pitching prospect alleging negligence and violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in requiring that he be vaccinated for COVID-19 and in treating the symptoms that resulted from the vaccination and ultimately ended his career.
-
February 20, 2026
5 Decades And Counting: Union, EEOC Case Still Unsettled After 2nd Circuit Ruling
NEW YORK — The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission failed to persuade the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to overrule a federal judge’s denial of a proposed consent decree reached with a New York-based union and its affiliated associations that would have settled racial discrimination claims in litigation for more than 50 years; the court instead affirmed that the agreement was not “fair and reasonable.”
-
February 20, 2026
Judge Approves EEOC, Geisinger Consent Decree In Disability Bias Suit
PHILADELPHIA — Certain Geisinger hospital entities accused of discriminating against employees who took medical leave by requiring them to reapply and compete for employment opportunities when returning from leave agreed to make practice and policy changes and pay $450,000 in back pay and statutory damages to six workers, according to a consent decree between the entities and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that was approved by a federal judge in Pennsylvania.
-
February 19, 2026
11th Circuit Majority Upholds Dismissal Of Non-FLSA Claims In CBD Franchisee Suit
ATLANTA — An 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals majority held that a federal judge in Florida was correct in dismissing a fired CBD retail franchisee’s non-Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) claims of fraudulent transfer following a settlement agreement, finding that the enforceability of the release of the claims “is a matter of state contract law, not federal FLSA law.”
-
February 18, 2026
Hotel Urges High Court To Affirm Federal Courts Have Post-Arbitration Jurisdiction
WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a Feb. 17 response brief filed in a U.S. Supreme Court case challenging whether a federal court should retain jurisdiction after ordering a stay pending arbitration when deciding post-arbitration motions, the owners and operators of a West Hollywood luxury hotel argue that there is nothing in the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) or case law that “overrides the ordinary jurisdictional rules” stating that “federal courts with preexisting jurisdiction may resolve related claims in the same pending case.”
-
February 17, 2026
Arbitration Of NFL Coaches’ Race Bias Claims Denied As High Court Mulls Petition
NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York on Feb. 13 revised a March 2023 arbitration order in a race bias and retaliation putative class case brought by three current and former National Football League (NFL) coaches and denied in full arbitration sought by the NFL and three teams based on “[t]he NFL’s unilateral control over the dispute resolution process”; the trial court ruling was filed as the U.S. Supreme Court considers a petition for a writ of certiorari filed in the same case by the NFL and three teams concerning the enforceability of those same arbitration agreements that require Commissioner Roger Goodell to preside over the proceedings.
-
February 17, 2026
Split 3rd Circuit Revives Hospital System Workers’ Title VII COVID Shot Claims
PHILADELPHIA — A split Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel vacated a lower court’s dismissal of Title VII claims brought by more than 100 employees of a Pennsylvania hospital network against their employer alleging failure to provide a reasonable accommodation for exemption from a systemwide COVID-19 vaccine policy on religious grounds, finding that the employees “plausibly alleged the circumstantial unreasonableness of” an accommodation that required them to undergo testing using swabs sterilized with a carcinogen.
-
February 17, 2026
‘Regarded As’ ADA Claim Based On COVID Vaccination Status Stayed Pending Mediation
PITTSBURGH — In a former employee’s lawsuit brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) claiming that her employer failed to accommodate what it perceived as the medical disability of being immunocompromised after she refused to become vaccinated for COVID-19, a Pennsylvania federal magistrate judge ordered the case stayed pending the completion of mediation.
-
February 13, 2026
Fired Sales Rep Wants High Court To View ‘Novel’ Circuit Ruling In Title VII Case
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A fired employee who brought federal and state harassment, discrimination and retaliation claims against the cleaning products manufacturer that terminated her is asking the U.S. Supreme Court in a petition for writ of certiorari to determine if the negligence standard that applies to claims of Title VII workplace harassment by a co-worker also applies to harassment by a customer.
-
February 12, 2026
Wash. High Court To Review $936K Fine Of Restaurant That Operated During Pandemic
OLYMPIA, Wash. — The Washington Supreme Court granted the petition of a restaurant business seeking review of a state appellate court affirmance of a trial court ruling that affirmed the imposition of fines totaling $936,000 by the state Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) for violations of COVID-era emergency proclamations prohibiting restaurants from offering dine-in services, which the business said were unconstitutionally excessive.
-
February 12, 2026
Attorney Fee Denial In Federal Workers’ Lump-Sum Payment Class Case Vacated
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel vacated a trial court’s denial of attorney fees for former government employees who negotiated a settlement with the United States in a class case over unused leave payments and directed the lower court on remand to address in the first instance whether the United States’ conduct prior to the lawsuit was “substantially justified.”
-
February 12, 2026
Ohio Federal Judge Won’t OK FLSA Settlement In Pizza Delivery Driver Pay Suit
CINCINNATI — Joining what was described as an emerging trend in the district, a federal judge in Ohio held, in denying as moot an unopposed motion to approve a settlement agreement between a class of pizza delivery drivers and their employer over cost reimbursements, that the court is not required to approve the terms of a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) negotiated settlement and that doing so “would amount to an impermissible advisory opinion.”