Mealey's Emerging Insurance Disputes

  • April 30, 2025

    Residents Sue State-Mandated Insurer ‘Of Last Resort’ Over Los Angeles Wildfires

    LOS ANGELES — California residents sued the California Fair Plan Association (CFPA) and its largest members in a state court seeking damages for the defendants’ alleged bad faith breach of their property insurance policies following the Los Angeles wildfires in January.

  • April 30, 2025

    Assignee Seeks To Appeal Suit Against Insurance Agency To Pennsylvania High Court

    PHILADELPHIA — An insured’s assignee filed a petition in a Pennsylvania court asking for allowance to appeal the court’s ruling that affirmed a lower court’s grant of an insurance agency’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in its breach of contract lawsuit seeking coverage for an underlying wrongful death settlement, challenging the court’s finding that the suit is barred by the statute of limitations.

  • April 29, 2025

    Alaska Federal Judge Grants Insurer’s Motion To Dismiss COVID-19 Coverage Suit

    ANCHORAGE, Ala. — Following the Alaska Supreme Court’s answers to two certified questions in a coronavirus coverage dispute, a federal judge in Alaska on April 28 entered judgment in favor of an insurer after granting its motion to dismiss an insured’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit seeking coverage for loss of business income under the Communicable Disease Suspension of Operations provision in the insurance policy.

  • April 28, 2025

    Judge Dismisses Coverage Suit Over Claims Insured Misrepresented Cannabis Products

    ROCKFORD, Ill. —The same day a commercial general liability insurer filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice, an Illinois federal judge dismissed the insurer’s lawsuit seeking a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify in an underlying putative class lawsuit alleging that its insureds knowingly or recklessly misrepresented and advertised their products as cannabis concentrates and misclassified the products to avoid regulations.

  • April 28, 2025

    Panel Says No Additional Coverage Owed For Underlying Carbon Monoxide Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — An insured landlord is not entitled to additional coverage for the settlement of a tenant’s underlying bodily injury suit arising out of carbon monoxide poisoning because the apartment insurance policy’s liability limit applies only to the year in which the occurrence took place, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said April 25 in affirming a district court’s finding that the stacking of annual policy limits is prohibited by the policy.

  • April 28, 2025

    9th Circuit: Care, Custody Or Control Exclusion Bars Coverage For Aircraft Damage

    PHOENIX — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower federal court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of an insurer in its lawsuit disputing coverage for damage to an aircraft, finding that the policy’s care, custody and control exclusion bars coverage.

  • April 25, 2025

    Texas High Court Grants Agreed Motion To Dismiss Insurer’s Petition For Review

    AUSTIN, Texas — The Texas Supreme Court on April 25 granted a commercial property insurer and its insured’s agreed motion to dismiss the insurer’s petition seeking review of a lower court’s partial summary judgment order in a coronavirus coverage dispute, according to its orders pronounced.

  • April 25, 2025

    Federal Judge: No Coverage Owed For Defendant’s Admitted Acts Of Child Exploitation

    JACKSON, Miss. — A federal judge in Mississippi granted an insurer’s motion for summary judgment in its declaratory judgment lawsuit disputing coverage for a defendant’s admitted acts of child exploitation, finding that two of the defendants were not insureds under the policies at issue and the alleged underlying intentional conduct was not “an accident” and, therefore, no coverage was owed.

  • April 24, 2025

    N.Y. Justice Denies Summary Judgment Motions By NFL, Insurers In Concussion Suit

    NEW YORK — A New York justice denied motions for summary judgment filed by the National Football League and insurers in a coverage dispute over underlying lawsuits alleging that the NFL negligently failed to protect former players from brain injuries purportedly caused by concussive head impact, saying that the court cannot determine that coverage has been established as a matter of law.

  • April 23, 2025

    On Remand, Judge Rules For Professional Liability Insurer On Bad Faith Claim

    SALT LAKE CITY — On remand from the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, a federal judge in Utah granted a professional liability insurer’s motion for summary judgment on the remaining bad faith claim in a coverage dispute arising from a medical malpractice lawsuit.

  • April 23, 2025

    Class Action Alleges Toyota, Progressive Violated Federal Wiretap Act

    SHERMAN, Texas — A class action was filed in a Texas federal court alleging Toyota Motor North America Inc., Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. and a provider of data analytics services in the automotive industry violated the Federal Wiretap Act and seeking to hold the defendants responsible for the injuries they inflicted on tens of thousands of class members because of their unauthorized collection and dissemination of private information from Toyota vehicles.

  • April 22, 2025

    Homeowners Accuse Insurers Of ‘Nefarious Conspiracy’ In Suit Arising From Wildfires

    LOS ANGELES — California homeowners affected by the Los Angeles wildfires sued insurers in a California court for violations of the state’s Cartwright Act and unfair competition law (UCL), alleging that the insurers participated in a “nefarious conspiracy to eliminate competition between them, and to intentionally and systematically force Plaintiffs to obtain fire insurance from the state’s insurer of last resort.”

  • April 21, 2025

    Majority Reverses Ruling In Insurer’s Favor In Bad Faith Suit Over Fatal Shooting

    ATLANTA — A majority of the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on April 18 reversed a lower federal court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of an insurer in a lawsuit alleging that the insurer acted in bad faith when it failed to make a settlement offer in an estate’s lawsuit alleging negligent security against the insured, finding that a jury could reasonably find that the insurer knew or should have known that the insured’s liability was clear.

  • April 21, 2025

    Iowa High Court Reverses, Remands Ruling In Consumer Fraud Coverage Dispute

    DES MOINES, Iowa — The Iowa Supreme Court on April 18 held that the record provides the facts needed to demonstrate that consumer fraud alleged against a contractor in an underlying action is not a covered “occurrence” under the contractor’s commercial general liability insurance policy and the purported harm does not include covered “property damage” pursuant to the policy, vacating an appeals court’s ruling, reversing a trial court’s order and remanding for the trial court to enter summary judgment in favor of the insurer.

  • April 18, 2025

    Suquamish Tribe Opposes Insurers’ High Court Petition In Tribal Jurisdiction Dispute

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Suquamish Tribe in Washington filed an opposition to insurers’ petition for writ of certiorari asking the U.S. Supreme Court to determine “whether a tribal court can exercise jurisdiction over nonmembers of the tribe based on off-reservation conduct,” asking the high court to not disturb the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ opinion that affirmed a federal court’s finding that a tribal court has subject matter jurisdiction over a COVID-19 coverage suit involving tribal properties on tribal land.

  • April 17, 2025

    9th Circuit Dismisses Claims Against Insurer In Mold Damage Coverage Dispute

    SAN FRANCISCO — A panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on April 16 affirmed a lower court’s ruling in a mold and moisture damage coverage dispute finding that a contractor violated the terms of an insurance policy by incurring more than $1 million in repair costs without first seeking consent from an insurer.

  • April 16, 2025

    Denial Of Arbitration In D&O Coverage Dispute Affirmed By 2nd Circuit

    NEW YORK — A Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on April 15 affirmed the denial of an insurer’s motion to compel a dispute over coverage owed to directors and officers of a bankrupt health care corporation be arbitrated before the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), opining that the bankruptcy trustee is not acting as policyholder in the dispute.

  • April 16, 2025

    No E&O Coverage Owed For $262,500 Insured Paid To Hospital, 5th Circuit Affirms

    NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on April 15 affirmed summary judgment in favor of a managed care organization’s errors and omissions insurer in the insured’s bad faith lawsuit seeking coverage for the $262,500 it paid to a hospital to settle an underlying claim, finding that no coverage exists because the insured paid the underlying claim without the insurer’s prior consent.

  • April 16, 2025

    6th Circuit: No Coverage Owed For Trademark Infringement Suit Against Pharmacy

    CINCINNATI — The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower federal court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of insurers in a pharmacist insured’s breach of contract lawsuit seeking coverage for underlying trademark infringement and false advertising claims brought by a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, finding that one policy’s professional services exclusion barred coverage and the other policy was not triggered because the underlying lawsuit was not brought by “natural persons.”

  • April 16, 2025

    Georgia Federal Court Dismisses Coverage Dispute Over Wrongful Death Claim

    ATLANTA — One day after a commercial general liability insurer filed a notice asking a Georgia federal court to dismiss its lawsuit seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its tavern operator insured for an underlying wrongful death lawsuit, the court clerk approved the dismissal.

  • April 16, 2025

    Insureds Seek Coverage For 11 Suits Alleging Human Trafficking At Red Roof Hotels

    COLUMBUS, Ohio — Insured hotel companies sued their general liability insurer in an Ohio federal court for breach of contract and bad faith, alleging that the insurer arbitrarily and capriciously denied coverage for 11 underlying lawsuits alleging that human trafficking occurred at various Red Roof hotels.

  • April 15, 2025

    Stipulation Filed In Fraudulent Transfer Case After Insurer Liquidation Settlement

    TOPEKA, Kan. — After being advised that settlement agreements were approved by a Kansas state court, parties in a fraudulent transfer case in Kansas federal court involving the insolvent insurer filed a stipulation of dismissal.

  • April 15, 2025

    Bad Faith Suit: CFPA Systematically Failed To Investigate, Pay Wildfire Claims

    LOS ANGELES — Plaintiffs sued California Fair Plan Association (CFPA) and its “largest” members for breach of contract and bad faith in a California court, seeking compensation for their losses incurred by the January Los Angeles wildfires and to hold CFPA “accountable for its decade-long, systematic failure to properly investigate and pay wildfire claims.”

  • April 15, 2025

    Skechers Seeks Coverage For Injury Claims Caused By Shoes’ Lack Of Slip-Resistance

    LOS ANGELES — Skechers USA Inc. sued its commercial liability insurer in a California court for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and unfair competition, alleging that the insurer has a duty to defend it against an underlying action contending that class members were harmed by actual physical accidents caused by the insured’s shoes’ lack of slip-resistance or by the fact that the shoes were unusable.

  • April 14, 2025

    Insured Dismisses 1 Insurer In Coverage Dispute Over Earplug Product Liability Claims

    WILMINGTON, Del. — Plaintiffs and one of their liability insurers filed in a Delaware court a stipulation and proposed order of voluntary dismissal with prejudice of all claims between them in a coverage lawsuit arising from an underlying earplug product liability multidistrict litigation that resulted in a $6 billion settlement and millions of dollars in defense costs.