Mealey's Emerging Insurance Disputes

  • March 04, 2025

    6th Circuit Affirms Ruling In Favor Of Dentist’s Professional Liability Insurer

    CINCINNATI — The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held that because an appellant did not provide a professional liability insurer with “all reasonably obtainable information” about her potential negligence claim against a dentist insured, the insurer had no contractual duty to the insured and, as a result, the appellant’s bad faith claim fails.

  • March 04, 2025

    Panel: Coverage Barred For $3M Judgment Over Unpaid Wages, Commissions Claims

    NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held that a breach of contract exclusion barred employment practices liability and directors and officers liability coverage for a more than $3 million underlying state court judgment in favor of former employees who sued the insured for breach of contract for unpaid wages and commissions, affirming a lower court’s ruling in favor of the insurer in its declaratory judgment lawsuit.

  • March 04, 2025

    Silica Exposure Lawsuits Involve More Than 1 Occurrence, Insured Says In Complaint

    NEW YORK — A commercial general liability insurer breached its contract and acted in bad faith by determining that more than 100 underlying silica exposure lawsuits filed against the insured are subject to coverage under only one insurance policy and involve only a single occurrence under the policy, an insured alleges in a complaint filed in New York federal court.

  • March 04, 2025

    COMMENTARY: Sustainability Recalibration: What Insurers And Policyholders Should Know About ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance Considerations) Under Trump 2.0, Part 1

    By Scott M. Seaman

  • February 25, 2025

    COMMENTARY: AI Risk: New Tech, Same Coverage

    By Michael S. Levine, Alex D. Pappas and Torrye N. Zullo

  • March 03, 2025

    Pollution Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage For Carbon Monoxide Death

    ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Answering a certified question from the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, the Alaska Supreme Court determined that a pollution exclusion does not bar coverage for the carbon monoxide death of a 17-year-old because it was reasonable for the insureds to expect that coverage would be afforded based on a reading of the pollution exclusion.

  • March 03, 2025

    Judge Partly Grants Insured’s Motion For Summary Judgment In D&O Coverage Suit

    WILMINGTON, Del. — A Delaware judge granted in part and denied in part an insured’s motion for summary judgment in a directors and officers liability coverage dispute over an underlying shareholder lawsuit, concluding that the underlying settlement’s stock payment is a covered “loss” under the policies but there are genuine issues of fact as to the consent-to-settle policy provision.

  • March 03, 2025

    Judgment Granted For Insurer In Row Over Sinking Vessel Coverage, Policy Voidance

    MIAMI — A Florida federal judge adopted a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to grant summary judgment to an insurer in its declaratory judgment suit seeking to void a marine policy for material misrepresentations and to deny coverage for the partial sinking of a vessel, finding that the magistrate judge correctly determined that the policy was voided due to an inaccurate answer to a policy application question that was material to the decision to issue the policy.

  • March 03, 2025

    Insurers Settle Coverage Dispute With Taco Bell Owners Over BIPA Violation Claims

    SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — The same day commercial general liability and umbrella insurers and the owners and operators of Taco Bell restaurants in Illinois indicated that they have agreed in principle to settle the insurers’ lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment that they have no duty to defend and indemnify in an underlying class action alleging that the insureds violated the state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), a federal magistrate judge in Illinois issued an order on Feb. 28 noting that all scheduled hearings are vacated and any pending motions are rendered moot.

  • February 28, 2025

    Insurer: No Coverage Owed For Suit Arising From Blockade In Support of Palestine

    NEW YORK — A commercial general liability and directors and officers liability insurer filed a lawsuit in a New York federal court seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify against an underlying lawsuit alleging that its insured was instrumental in coordinating an April 15 blockade as part of an international campaign to disrupt the off-ramp leading into Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport in support of the liberation of Palestine.

  • February 28, 2025

    Trustees Have No Standing To Sue D&O Liability Insurer, 4th Circuit Affirms

    RICHMOND, Va. — The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals determined that neither the trustee of a bankrupt company nor a personal bankruptcy trustee has standing to sue the company’s directors and officers liability insurer, affirming a lower federal court’s ruling that agreed with a bankruptcy court’s dismissal of an adversary proceeding brought against the insurer.

  • February 27, 2025

    Petitioners In Baltimore Bridge Collapse Suit Ordered To Be Deposed In U.S.

    BALTIMORE — A federal chief magistrate judge in Maryland on Feb. 26 granted claimants’ motion to compel petitioners and their management agents and employees to submit to depositions in a Maryland federal court in an exoneration lawsuit brought by the owner and technical manager of the ship that allided with and destroyed the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore.

  • February 27, 2025

    Judge Enters Judgment In Coverage Suit Over Sexual Abuse Claims Against Coach

    TACOMA, Wash. — A federal judge in Washington entered final judgment in favor of a homeowners insurer after finding that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its coach insured for underlying sexual abuse lawsuits.

  • February 26, 2025

    Judge Dismisses Hospital’s $2.5M D&O Coverage Suit Over DOJ, AG Investigations

    CHICAGO — A federal judge in Illinois granted an insurer’s motion to dismiss a hospital insured’s breach of contract lawsuit, finding that the insurer’s liability is capped by the Regulatory Claim Endorsement’s $1 million sublimit and that the hospital failed to allege that the insurer breached its duty to pay for its $2.5 million in remaining defense expenses arising from underlying criminal federal and state investigations into the hospital’s employees and officers.

  • February 26, 2025

    Georgia Panel Reverses Ruling In Surety Bond Dispute Over Employee Embezzlement

    ATLANTA — A Georgia appeals court concluded that a county’s claims for payment under two public official bonds were barred by a three-year statute of limitations, reversing a lower court’s ruling against a surety in the county’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit demanding coverage for its losses arising from employee embezzlement.

  • February 25, 2025

    Knowledge-Of-Falsity Policy Exclusion Bars Coverage, 10th Circuit Affirms

    DENVER — The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 24 affirmed a lower federal court’s summary judgment in favor of primary and excess commercial general liability insurers in their lawsuit disputing coverage for an underlying slander of title action brought against their insured, finding that the policies’ knowledge-of-falsity exclusions preclude coverage.

  • February 25, 2025

    Florida Panel Affirms Ruling In Insurer’s Favor In Coronavirus Coverage Suit

    MIAMI — A Florida appeals panel on Feb. 19 affirmed a lower court’s judgment in favor of an insurer in an insured’s declaratory judgment lawsuit seeking coverage for its business interruption losses as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, concluding that nothing in the record supports the insured’s contention that the governmental shutdown orders “were issued ‘due to’ specific conditions at the premises of the Insured.”

  • February 25, 2025

    N.J. High Court Agrees To Review Pharmaceutical Company’s D&O Coverage Suit

    TRENTON, N.J. — The New Jersey Supreme Court granted a pharmaceutical company insured’s petition for certification seeking high court review of an appeals court’s reversal of a lower court’s rulings in its favor in its declaratory judgment lawsuit seeking directors and officers liability coverage for an underlying lawsuit.

  • February 24, 2025

    Insurers Ask Supreme Court To Decide Whether Tribal Court Can Exercise Jurisdiction

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — After the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals denied insurers’ petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc asking it to reconsider its opinion that affirmed a federal court’s finding that a tribal court has subject matter jurisdiction over a COVID-19 coverage suit involving tribal properties on tribal land, the insurers filed a petition for writ of certiorari asking the U.S. Supreme Court to determine “whether a tribal court can exercise jurisdiction over nonmembers of the tribe based on off-reservation conduct.”

  • February 24, 2025

    Judge Rules On Insurers’ Dismissal Motions In Coverage Suit Over Sexual Abuse Claims

    WILMINGTON, Del. — A Delaware judge granted two commercial general liability insurers’ motions to dismiss an insured’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit seeking coverage for underlying sexual abuse claims brought by minors who participated in competitive cheerleading after finding that the exercise of personal jurisdiction over these two insurers would offend due process but denied all other motions to dismiss brought by the remaining insurers.

  • February 20, 2025

    N.Y. Appeals Court: Coverage Owed For Insured’s Loss Of 502,315 Soybean Bushels

    NEW YORK — A New York appeals court affirmed a lower court’s grant of a physical commodities trader insured’s motion for partial summary judgment on declaratory judgment and breach of contract counterclaims against its insurers in their lawsuit disputing coverage for the insured’s loss of 502,315 bushels of soybeans, agreeing with the lower court that the insured established an actual loss under the policies.

  • February 19, 2025

    Judge Partly Rejects Magistrate’s Report In Coverage Suit Over Retaliation Claims

    MIAMI — A federal judge in Florida affirmed in part and rejected in part a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation in a coverage dispute over retaliation claims against Miami and its employees, denying the city’s motion to dismiss the insurer’s declaratory judgment lawsuit, granting the insurer’s motion to stay proceedings as to the unripe duty-to-indemnify claims and quashing discovery requests.

  • February 19, 2025

    Media Tech Insurer, Financial Services Firm Settle Data Breach Coverage Dispute

    SEATTLE — A media tech insurer that filed suit and its financial services firm insured filed a notice in a Washington federal court indicating they have settled the insurer’s lawsuit seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify the insured for a bank’s indemnification demand for a data breach incident and a related subrogation lawsuit brought by the bank’s insurer.

  • February 18, 2025

    Excess Insurer Appeals Ruling In BIPA Violation Coverage Dispute

    CHICAGO — An excess insurer filed a notice indicating that it is appealing an Illinois federal court’s ruling granting in part and denying in part cross-motions for summary judgment in a franchisee of the Burger King chain’s breach of contract lawsuit seeking a declaration that the insurer has a duty to defend against an underlying putative class lawsuit alleging that the insured violated the Illinois Biometric Information Protection Act (BIPA).

  • February 18, 2025

    Class Action Alleges Allstate Collected, Sold Data Without Plaintiffs’ Consent

    CHICAGO — A class action complaint filed in Illinois federal court alleges that The Allstate Corp. and its subsidiaries collected and sold the plaintiffs’ personal data and “‘trillions of miles’ worth of ‘driving behavior’” data without their consent.