Newsletter RSS

Mealey's Insurance Bad Faith

  • March 19, 2026

    Homeowner’s Case Against Insurer Dismissed For Lack Of Controversy

    ALLENTOWN, Pa. — A federal magistrate judge in Pennsylvania granted a solar panel company’s insurer’s motion to dismiss a case a homeowner brought against the insurer for denying his claim after the solar panel company’s faulty workmanship on the property caused damage, finding that the homeowner failed to allege facts to establish subject matter jurisdiction or establish a controversy.

  • March 19, 2026

    Insureds’ Bad Faith Claim Not Supported By Sufficient Facts, Federal Judge Says

    INDIANAPOLIS — An Indiana federal judge dismissed a bad faith claim without prejudice after determining that the insureds failed to show that the insurer of a recreational vehicle wrongfully refused to pay policy proceeds, deceived the insureds or delayed the adjustment of the insureds’ vandalism claim.

  • March 19, 2026

    Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Suit Against Auto Insurer, Georgia Panel Determines

    ATLANTA — A trial court erred in dismissing an insured’s breach of contract and bad faith complaint against his auto insurer because the insurer’s filing of an interpleader action and its deposit of the insured’s auto policy limits into a court registry did not absolve the insurer from its duty to protect the insured from the entry of an excess verdict in an underlying suit filed against the insured, a Georgia appeals panel said.

  • March 19, 2026

    Federal Judge Severs Bad Faith Claim, Enters $9.8M Judgment In Favor Of Insured

    PANAMA CITY, Fla. — To correct a “procedural conundrum” indicated by the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals while ruling on an insurer’s petition for writ of mandamus challenging an order requiring it to produce discovery on an insured’s bad faith claim, a federal judge in Florida severed a bad faith claim from a breach of contract claim in a Hurricane Michael coverage dispute and entered a $9,817,232.97 final judgment in favor of the insured on the breach of contract claim so the severed claims can proceed as their own separate lawsuits and result in separate final judgments from which appeals may be filed.

  • March 19, 2026

    Magistrate Judge Finds Course Of Construction Exclusion Bars Coverage

    LOS ANGELES — A federal magistrate judge in California granted insurers’ motion for summary judgment on claims brought against them by an insured subcontractor for not defending or indemnifying it in an underlying construction-defect arbitration because coverage was barred under the policy as the construction project at issue was not completed.

  • March 18, 2026

    Judge Refuses To Dismiss Restaurants’ Amended Complaint In Coronavirus Coverage Suit

    DURHAM, N.C. — Three months after granting a commercial property insurer’s motion to dismiss claims for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and unfair and deceptive trade practices brought by four Durham restaurants seeking coverage for their business interruption losses arising from the lockdowns prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic, a federal judge in North Carolina denied the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insureds’ amended complaint because it now includes facts that make the claims plausible to the extent that they are based on the insurer’s conduct since the North Carolina Supreme Court’s ruling in N. State Deli, LLC v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

  • March 16, 2026

    Insured’s Bad Faith Suit Barred By Policy’s Suit Limitation Provision, Judge Says

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge granted a homeowners insurer’s motion for summary judgment in a breach of contract and bad faith suit stemming from a coverage dispute over the insured’s water damage claim because the insured failed to file suit within one year of the inception of the loss as required by the policy’s suit limitation provision.

  • March 16, 2026

    9th Circuit Affirms Insurer’s Win In Widow’s Suit Over Life Insurance Payment

    PASADENA, Calif. — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel affirmed the grant of summary judgment against a widow bringing a putative class action lawsuit against an insurer for alleged underpayment of a life insurance policy, allegedly in breach of contract and violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL), writing that the insurer paid the policy in full and was entitled to deduct unpaid premiums.

  • March 13, 2026

    COMMENTARY: America 250: A History Of Insurance And Insurance Coverage Law And Litigation In The United States, Part 1

    By Scott M. Seaman, Pedro E. Hernandez and Peter J. Lewis

  • March 13, 2026

    Magistrate Rules On Discovery Motion In Suit Alleging Insurer Illegally Employs AI

    MINNEAPOLIS — A federal magistrate judge in Minnesota granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs’ motion to compel an insurer to respond to discovery and produce certain documents in their class complaint alleging that it illegally uses artificial intelligence (AI) to deny elderly insureds medically necessary care based on a model it knows “has a 90% error rate,” ordering the insurer to produce all required documents within 21 days.

  • March 13, 2026

    Georgia Panel Affirms Ruling In Boat Manufacturer’s Favor In Bad Faith Coverage Suit

    ATLANTA — A Georgia appeals panel on March 12 affirmed a lower court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of a boat manufacturer insured in its lawsuit alleging that its insurers acted in bad faith for failing to settle an underlying action arising from a boating accident that killed a 7-year-old boy, holding that the record evidence established that the primary insurer was at all times responsible for the insured’s defense and never tendered its policy limits to the insured.

  • March 13, 2026

    RICO, Conspiracy Claims Dismissed In Workers’ Comp Case Involving Reinsurer, MGA

    BROOKLYN, N.Y. — A New York federal judge dismissed without prejudice civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and RICO conspiracy claims brought by a reinsurer and a managing general agency (MGA) against medical providers and law firms in a workers’ compensation fraud suit, holding that alleged reimbursement and administrative injuries were too remote to establish proximate cause and that the reinsurer and MGA failed to plausibly plead an association-in-fact enterprise or agreement in their first amended complaint.

  • March 12, 2026

    Federal Magistrate Judge Says Insured Failed To Show Entitlement To UIM Benefits

    HOUSTON — A Texas federal magistrate judge dismissed an insured’s breach of contract claim without prejudice and abated the insured’s extracontractual claims after determining that the insured has not established that the tortfeasor was at fault for an accident or that he is entitled to underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits under his employer’s auto policy.

  • March 12, 2026

    Homeowners Insurer’s Transfer Of Venue Not Warranted, Magistrate Judge Says

    KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A Missouri federal magistrate judge denied a homeowners insurer’s motion to transfer venue from the Western District of Missouri to the Eastern District of Missouri because the insurer failed to show that the Eastern District is a more convenient forum for the parties or the witnesses.

  • March 12, 2026

    Suit Involving Cousin’s Purported Disability Fraud Is Dismissed As Untimely

    DALLAS — Without substantive explanation, a Texas federal judge overruled objections and accepted a report and recommendation to dismiss as untimely a lawsuit involving fraud and bad faith claims in which the pro se plaintiff challenged a roughly two-decade-old termination of long-term disability (LTD) benefits and alleged that a cousin fraudulently used her identity to file a successful disability claim.

  • March 12, 2026

    5th Circuit Finds No Error In Lower Court’s Refusal To Consider Expert Affidavit

    NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a Texas federal judge’s ruling that breach of contract and bad faith claims alleged against a homeowners insurer in a dispute over coverage for water damage must be dismissed because the lower court did not err in failing to consider a late-filed affidavit by the insureds’ public adjuster.

  • March 11, 2026

    Judgment Granted For Travelers On Bad Faith Claim In Home Fire Coverage Dispute

    MACON, Ga. — A Georgia federal judge granted partial summary judgment to Travelers Personal Insurance Co. in a homeowner’s breach of contract and bad faith suit against the insurer for its purported failure to compensate the homeowner for a fire-related loss, finding that the insurer had reasonable grounds to deny the claim and, therefore, the bad faith claim fails.

  • March 10, 2026

    No Coverage Owed For Oil Spill Remediation Costs, Federal Judge Determines

    NEW BERN, N.C. — An insured’s breach of contract and bad faith claims alleged against its insurer cannot proceed because the insured failed to provide notice of an oil spill within seven days as required by the policy, a North Carolina federal judge said in granting the insurer’s motion for summary judgment and denying the insured’s motion for summary judgment.

  • March 06, 2026

    Federal Judge Remands Hail, Windstorm Coverage Dispute To Oklahoma State Court

    OKLAHOMA CITY — A federal judge in Oklahoma granted insureds’ motion to remand their coverage lawsuit against their insurer and agent arising from hail and windstorm damage to their home, holding that the insurer has failed to satisfy the high burden required to establish that the agent was fraudulently joined and noting that the court has already found remand appropriate in cases that are “remarkably similar.”

  • March 04, 2026

    Settlement Conference Set After Judgment Granted In Insurance Application Dispute

    LAS VEGAS —  A Nevada federal magistrate judge ordered the parties to appear for a settlement conference after a federal judge granted in part and denied in part cross-motions for summary judgment in insureds’ suit seeking coverage for expenses in defending another suit regarding fraud-based claims.

  • March 03, 2026

    Disability Insurer’s Interpretation Of Plan Terms Wins In COLA Benefits Dispute

    SALT LAKE CITY — Distinguishing Colt v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co. because of the concessions the insurer in that case made, a Utah federal judge ruled against a former anesthesiologist who argued that he was entitled to lifetime benefits under cost of living adjustment (COLA) riders per the terms of his disability income coverage.

  • March 02, 2026

    Complaint Seeking Confirmation Of Crop Insurance Arbitration Award Dismissed

    LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — An Arkansas federal judge dismissed with prejudice a crop insurance lawsuit in which a pair of farmers sought confirmation of an arbitration award against an insurer; a day prior, the parties filed a joint stipulation in dismiss the request for confirmation, as well as the farmers’ claims for breach of contract and insurance bad faith.

  • February 25, 2026

    5th Circuit Refuses To Reconsider Ruling In Insurer’s Favor In Coverage Dispute

    NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Feb. 24 denied an insured’s petition to reconsider its ruling that affirmed a lower federal court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of an insurer in a breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit, standing by its ruling that the insured failed to provide evidence suggesting that hail occurred within the relevant policy period and, as a result, did not establish a genuine dispute of material fact regarding whether covered damage occurred.

  • February 25, 2026

    Judge: No Reasonably Clear Evidence Of Bad Faith In Hurricane Beryl Coverage Suit

    HOUSTON — A federal judge in Texas granted an insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment as to the insured’s claim that it violated Texas Insurance Code Chapter 541 when it underpaid a claim for property damage that was caused by Hurricane Beryl, concluding that there is no “reasonably clear” evidence that the insurer acted in bad faith.

  • February 25, 2026

    Texas Federal Judge Finds Most Of Insured’s Claims Stand In Payment Dispute

    DALLAS — A federal judge in Texas, in partially denying an insurance carrier’s motion for summary judgment, ruled that breach of contract and Texas insurance law claims that a homeowner brought against his insurer regarding coverage of damages after a pipe burst will survive but that a common-law bad faith claim will be dismissed.