Mealey's Insurance Bad Faith
-
April 14, 2025
Insureds’ Breach Of Contract, Bad Faith Suit Barred By Doctrine Of Res Judicata
HOUSTON — A breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit filed by insureds against their homeowners insurer must be dismissed based on the doctrine of res judicata because the insureds’ suit is based on the same claims that were brought or could have been brought in a prior lawsuit filed by the insureds.
-
April 09, 2025
COMMENTARY: The Ultimate Social Inflation Survival Guide: Containing Rising Claims Costs In A World Rife With Economic Inflation, Litigation Funding, Nuclear Verdicts, And Anti-Corporate Sentiment
By Scott M. Seaman
-
April 11, 2025
Federal Magistrate Judge Says Bad Faith, Breach Claims Against Auto Insurer Fail
DURHAM, N.C. — A North Carolina federal magistrate judge granted an auto insurer’s motion to dismiss claims for breach of contract, bad faith and unfair trade practices after determining that the complaint fails to state sufficient facts to support a finding that the insurer breached its contract or acted in bad faith by failing to settle a claim brought against the insured.
-
April 09, 2025
Breach Of Contract Suit In Storm Coverage Dispute Is Untimely, Texas Panel Affirms
DALLAS — A Texas appeals court affirmed a lower court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of a homeowners insurer on remand of a coverage dispute arising from property damage caused by a wind and hailstorm, agreeing with the lower court that the insureds’ breach of contract lawsuit was untimely.
-
April 09, 2025
Bad Faith Refusal-To-Settle Claim Cannot Be Litigated In Garnishment Proceeding
LANSING, Mich. — In an issue of first impression, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed and remanded an appeals court’s ruling that a third-party claimant was permitted to file writs of garnishment against two insurers based on the claimant’s contention that the insurers acted in bad faith by failing to settle the claimant’s suit against an insured after determining that claims for bad faith refusal to settle are not subject to garnishment because there are no liquidated damages that could be collected through garnishment.
-
April 09, 2025
Bad Faith Claim In Water Damage Coverage Suit To Proceed, Judge Says
LOS ANGELES — An insured’s bad faith claim alleged against a homeowners insurer in a dispute over coverage for water damage in the insured’s home can proceed because dismissal of the bad faith claim would be premature, a California federal judge said in partially denying the insurer’s motion.
-
April 08, 2025
6th Circuit Refuses To Reconsider No Coverage Ruling In Professional Liability Suit
CINCINNATI — The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals denied an appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, refusing to reconsider its finding that her declaratory judgment and bad faith claims fail because she did not provide a professional liability insurer with “all reasonably obtainable information” about her potential negligence claim against a dentist insured.
-
April 07, 2025
Asbestos Exclusions Bar Coverage For Underlying Asbestos Bodily Injury Suits
INDIANAPOLIS — An insured’s breach of contract and bad faith suit filed against its insurer cannot proceed because the insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify the insured in underlying asbestos bodily injury suits based on asbestos exclusions included in the insurer’s policy, an Indiana federal judge said in granting the insurer’s motion to dismiss.
-
April 07, 2025
Multiple Claims Alleged By Insured In Faulty Work Coverage Suit Dismissed
NEWARK, N.J. — A New Jersey federal judge granted a professional liability insurer’s motion to dismiss an insured’s claims alleging breach of contract, bad faith, unjust enrichment and declaratory judgment after determining that the insured failed to identify a policy provision that was breached and failed to show that the insurer’s denial of coverage for an underlying suit related to the insured’s architectural work was unreasonable.
-
April 07, 2025
Judgment Denied In Breach Of Contract, Bad Faith Suit Over $70K Life Policy
ALBANY, Ga. — A Georgia federal judge granted in part and denied in part a motion for summary judgment filed by a life insurer in a breach of contract and bad faith suit against it by the beneficiary of a $70,000 life insurance policy, finding in part that a dispute of facts remains as to whether the decedent made misrepresentations in the policy application.
-
April 04, 2025
California Panel Reverses Judgment For Insurer In HOA’s Suit Over Water Damage
LOS ANGELES — Finding that there are issues of material fact regarding whether the water damage and faulty workmanship exclusions in a condominium homeowners association’s all risks policy preclude coverage for rain damage that occurred during a reroofing project, a California appellate panel reversed a lower court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer on the association’s breach of contract and bad faith claims.
-
April 02, 2025
5th Circuit Says No Additional Coverage Owed For Insured’s Hurricane Damage Claims
NEW ORLEANS — An insurer properly adjusted an insured’s claims for hurricane damages based on the actual cash value of the damages to the insured’s properties and did not act in bad faith in handling the claims, the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said in affirming a series of rulings issued by a district court.
-
April 01, 2025
Suit Against Contractors Pollution Liability Insurer Will Remain In Federal Court
BATON ROUGE, La. — A Louisiana federal judge adopted a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denied an insured’s motion to remand a bad faith lawsuit filed against a contractors professional and pollution liability insurer, agreeing with the magistrate judge that the suit is not a direct action suit under federal law as required to avoid federal jurisdiction.
-
April 01, 2025
Judge Says Policies’ Limit Is Based On Per-Claim Calculation Of Lead Injury Claims
ST. LOUIS — A Missouri federal judge denied an insurer’s motion for summary judgment in a coverage dispute over underlying personal injury claims arising out of the insured’s lead-smelting operations, rejecting the insurer’s argument that the total limit of liability under its first two policies issued to the insured is $1.5 million and explaining that the total limit of liability under the first two policies is $21.5 million based on a policy endorsement that changed the limits of liability to $500,000 per claim.
-
April 01, 2025
Insurer, Reinsurer Seek To Oppose Reconsideration Of Cleanup Case Production Ruling
PADUCAH, Ky. — An insurer and reinsurer seek leave from a Kentucky federal magistrate judge to file an opposition to a ferrosilicon producer’s motion for reconsideration of a January ruling that denied the producer’s motion to compel production of documents from the insurers in a dispute over pollution-related cleanup costs; they argue in their reply in support of their motion for leave that the motion for reconsideration violates at least two prior orders and improperly raises new arguments.
-
April 01, 2025
Washington Panel: Tribe Fails To Show COVID-19 Caused Direct Physical Loss, Damage
SEATTLE — A Washington appeals court panel on March 31 held that a federally recognized Indian tribe did not state a claim that the coronavirus caused “direct physical loss or damage” to its insured properties, affirming a lower court’s dismissal of the insured’s bad faith complaint arising from the pandemic.
-
March 31, 2025
Grant Of Summary Judgment Recommeded On Contract Breach Claim In Disability Suit
BUFFALO, N.Y. — A New York federal magistrate judge on March 28 recommended that a disability claimant’s motion for summary judgment on a breach of contract claim be granted because the evidence shows that the claimant remained disabled; however, the magistrate judge recommended that the claimant’s motion be denied on a claim alleging breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing because questions of fact exist on whether the insurer’s termination of benefits was reasonable.
-
March 31, 2025
Panel Reverses Ruling Based On Insureds’ Failure To Serve Remedy Notice To Insurer
MIAMI — The Third District Florida Court of Appeals reversed a trial court’s denial of an auto insurer’s motion for summary judgment in a bad faith suit after determining that the trial court erred in finding that the suit could proceed even though the insurer was not served with a civil remedy notice within 60 days as required under Florida law and as required prior to the filing of a bad faith lawsuit.
-
March 31, 2025
Insured’s Failure To Cooperate Dooms Contract Breach, Bad Faith Claims, Judge Says
SAN DIEGO — An insured’s breach of contract and bad faith claims against a property insurer cannot proceed because the insurer did not breach the contract or act in bad faith based on the insured’s failure to cooperate with the insurer’s requests during the investigation of the insured’s fire damage claim, a California federal judge said in granting the insurer’s motion for summary judgment.
-
March 28, 2025
Third-Party Bad Faith Claim To Proceed Against Auto Insurer, Judge Says
TAMPA, Fla. — A third-party claimant’s bad faith claim against an auto insurer can proceed because a question of fact exists as to whether the auto insurer acted reasonably in handling multiple claims asserted against the insured after an auto accident, a Florida federal judge said in denying the insurer’s motion for summary judgment.
-
March 28, 2025
5th Circuit Affirms Ruling In Insurer’s Favor In Bad Faith Suit Over Storm Damage
NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s judgment in favor of an insurer in a Texas insured’s bad faith lawsuit arising from a coverage dispute over wind and hail property damage, finding that the insured fully recovered its entitled-to insurance benefits and failed to present evidence that supports an independent injury caused by the insurer’s purported violations of the Texas Insurance Code.
-
March 27, 2025
Panel Says Breach Of Contract, Bad Faith Claims Against Property Insurer Fail
NEW ORLEANS — A Texas federal judge properly granted summary judgment on breach of contract and bad faith claims in favor of a property insurer because the insured failed to present any facts that would allow a fact finder to conclude that the losses were caused by a covered peril, the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said.
-
March 26, 2025
5th Circuit Affirms Ruling In Insurer’s Favor In Winter Storm Uri Coverage Dispute
NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals concluded that because insureds have recovered their insurance policy benefits in full through the insurer’s payment of the appraisal award and statutory interest, they cannot recover bad faith damages in their lawsuit arising from damage caused by winter storm Uri.
-
March 25, 2025
Deal Report Garners Stay In Former Surgeon’s Suit For LTD Benefits
TYLER, Texas — Saying in a March 24 notice that they “are working on finalizing” an unspecified settlement, the parties in a former surgeon’s suit for long-term disability (LTD) benefits and relief for alleged mishandling of her claim successfully asked a Texas federal court to stay all deadlines in the case for 60 days.
-
March 24, 2025
Judge Overrules Objections, Denies Dismissal In Former Surgeon’s Disability Case
TYLER, Texas — Saying that a disability insurer’s objections “are without merit,” a Texas federal judge on March 21 overruled them and adopted a report and recommendation in a suit where a former surgeon seeks long-term disability (LTD) benefits and relief for alleged mishandling of her claim, thereby denying a dismissal motion.