Newsletter RSS

Mealey's California Insurance

  • October 21, 2024

    Reinsurers Move To Compel Arbitration In Billings Dispute Involving MOU

    LOS ANGELES — Arguing that a dispute over reinsurance billings arising from asbestos bodily injury claims falls within the scope of the “broad” arbitration agreement in the excess of loss reinsurance treaty at issue, reinsurers in an Oct. 18 motion ask a California federal court to compel arbitration and dismiss or stay the case.

  • October 14, 2024

    Judgment Granted For Vehicle Insurer In Fraud Suit Over Driver Misrepresentation

    RIVERSIDE, Calif. — A California federal judge granted summary judgment to a motor carrier insurer in its suit seeking a determination that it is entitled to rescind its insured’s policy due to the insured’s material misrepresentation in his policy application where he omitted listing as a driver his employee who was killed in a motor vehicle accident while driving one of the insured’s vehicles.

  • October 14, 2024

    Insurer Ask 9th Circuit To Reconsider Ruling In Sex Trafficking Coverage Dispute

    SAN FRANCISCO — A commercial insurer filed a petition seeking rehearing of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ Sept. 25 ruling that affirmed a lower federal court’s dismissal of its declaratory judgment arising from an underlying multidistrict litigation alleging that the insured is liable under Texas’ sex trafficking statutes, challenging the panel’s finding that its duty to defend has not been extinguished because the underlying claims may impose liability on the insured that triggers coverage.

  • October 14, 2024

    Judge Denies Summary Judgment In UCL Suit Over Insurer’s Liability Under Lost Policy

    SANTA ANA, Calif. — A California federal judge on Oct. 11 denied an insurer’s motion for summary judgment on a suit brought against it for breach of contract and violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by the successor-in-interest to a school that is being sued for a 1976 sexual assault of a student by a teacher and claims to be an insured under a policy, the physical copies of which neither party possesses.

  • October 11, 2024

    Judge Vacates Trial In Equitable Contribution Suit After Parties Announce Settlement

    SAN DIEGO — A federal judge in California vacated a trial scheduled for Nov. 19 in an insurer’s lawsuit seeking equitable contribution from another insurer after it was left to defend a subcontractor against underlying claims that it installed faulty concrete in a parking garage, noting that the parties indicated they have reached a settlement.

  • October 10, 2024

    California Bishop Amends Complaint, Seeks Insurance Coverage For Sex Abuse Suits

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland, Calif., filed a fifth amended declaratory judgment and breach of statutory duty complaint in a California federal court against numerous insurers and the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA), which the plaintiff believes assumed responsibilities for its now-insolvent insurer, seeking a declaratory judgment stating that the plaintiff is entitled to a defense and indemnity regarding covered claims for the more than 300 suits filed against it related to alleged clergy sexual abuse.

  • October 10, 2024

    9th Circuit Unseals Driver’s Brief Challenging GEICO’s ‘Unfair’ COVID-19 Rebates

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals unsealed a brief filed by a driver appealing a federal judge’s grant of summary judgment on her class action claim for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) to GEICO for allegedly unfairly retaining an estimated $238 million in additional premium relief the driver says it owed insureds after the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • October 09, 2024

    Bound By Another Planet, Judge Reconsiders Ruling Against Insurer In COVID-19 Suit

    SANTA ANA, Calif. — A California federal judge on Oct. 8 granted an insurer’s motion to reconsider the court’s ruling that denied its motion for partial judgment on the pleadings in Live Nation Entertainment Inc.’s breach of contract lawsuit arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, dismissing with prejudice Live Nation’s claims for coverage that require a showing of physical loss or damage after concluding that the court is bound by the holding in Another Planet Entertainment, LLC v. Vigilant Insurance Co. that a “bare allegation” that “the actual or potential presence of the COVID-19 virus rendered [plaintiff's] property unusable for its intended purpose” is insufficient to demonstrate physical loss or damage to the insured property.

  • October 08, 2024

    9th Circuit Grants Restaurants’ Motion To Dismiss Appeal In COVID-19 Coverage Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Oct. 7 granted a motion by owners, operators and managers of two Napa Valley, Calif., restaurants to dismiss their appeal in a coronavirus coverage dispute after the California Supreme Court dismissed its consideration of the Ninth Circuit’s certified question asking whether an insurance policy’s virus exclusion is unenforceable.

  • October 08, 2024

    High Court Denies Certiorari In Auto Damage Suit Filed By Third-Party Claimant

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 7 denied a third-party claimant’s petition for writ of certiorari, refusing to review a California appellate court’s ruling that the claimant lacks standing to bring claims for negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) and bad faith against a tortfeasor’s auto insurer.

  • October 07, 2024

    U.S. Supreme Court Denies Certiorari In FCA Public Disclosure Bar Dispute

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 7 denied a petition for certiorari filed by pharmaceutical companies seeking review of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling that the public disclosure bar was not triggered in a case where it reversed a district court’s dismissal of a suit accusing the companies of violating the False Claims Act (FCA) by artificially inflating drug prices.

  • October 03, 2024

    Alter Ego Liability Theory Rejected In Ruling On Summary Judgment Motions

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Ruling on two motions for summary judgment on cross-claims in a suit involving reinsurance and related agreements, a California federal judge rejected an alter ego argument, granting one motion fully and the other partially.

  • October 01, 2024

    Fact Issues Exist On Whether Coverage Is Owed For Water, Mold Damages, Judge Says

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge denied a motion for summary judgment filed by insurers that denied coverage for mold and water damages sustained in numerous buildings of an insured’s construction project because questions of fact exist as to whether the policies’ fungus extension and delay in opening extension afford coverage and whether the policies’ exclusion for cost of making good (COMG) excluded coverage for any damage caused by faulty workmanship.

  • September 26, 2024

    Insurer Has Duty To Defend Sex Trafficking MDL, 9th Circuit Affirms

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Sept. 25 affirmed a lower federal court’s dismissal of a commercial insurer’s declaratory judgment arising from an underlying multidistrict litigation alleging that the insured is liable under Texas’ sex trafficking statutes, finding that the insurer’s duty to defend has not been extinguished because the underlying claims may impose liability on the insured that triggers coverage.

  • September 23, 2024

    California High Court Tosses Certified Question Following COVID-19 Coverage Ruling

    SAN FRANCISCO — In light of the recent ruling in John's Grill, Inc. v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., the California Supreme Court dismissed its consideration of a certified question from the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals asking whether an insurance policy’s virus exclusion is unenforceable in a coverage lawsuit brought by owners, operators and managers of two Napa Valley, Calif., restaurants in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic.

  • September 23, 2024

    9th Circuit Orders More Briefing In ERISA Tobacco Surcharge Arbitration Dispute

    SAN FRANCISCO — Following oral argument in which the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) participated as amicus curiae supporting application of the effective vindication doctrine in a putative class case, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ordered supplemental briefing in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act case over a tobacco surcharge.

  • September 19, 2024

    Judge Denies Summary Judgment On Issue Of Contamination Exclusion’s Applicability

    SANTA ANA, Calif. — A California federal judge refused to grant summary judgment in favor of an insured on the applicability of a policy’s contamination exclusion to losses sustained by the insured in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic because the evidence could support a jury finding that the insured believed that the contamination exclusion would apply as a bar to coverage for the losses caused by the coronavirus.

  • September 13, 2024

    Judge Denies Motion To Reconsider Rehab Plan For Workers’ Comp Insurer

    REDWOOD CITY, Calif. — Denying a motion that sought coverage of certain litigation costs for policyholders and a higher interest rate, a California state judge declined to reconsider her ruling approving a rehabilitation plan for California Insurance Co. (CIC), saying she “previously heard and considered these grounds.”

  • September 11, 2024

    Judge Dismisses FCA Case Against Sanofi In Insulin Drug Medicaid Rebate Dispute

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge granted dismissal to pharmaceutical company Sanofi in a qui tam suit filed against it by a former Medicaid provider alleging that Sanofi committed fraud in violation of the federal False Claims Act (FCA) and similar state laws by reporting false pricing information to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding insulin marketed under the brand name “Admelog,” finding that the provider failed to plead the complaint with the appropriate scienter.

  • September 11, 2024

    Insurer Dismisses Suit To Void Policy, Deny Coverage For Code Violation Fraud

    LOS ANGELES — A commercial insurer, without explanation, dismissed without prejudice its suit against its insured limited liability company in a California federal court seeking rescission of the insured’s policy and a declaration that the insurer is not obligated to pay for fire damage to the property due to the insured’s alleged material misrepresentations in the policy application regarding the absence of safety code violations and liens on the property when an investigation revealed otherwise.

  • September 10, 2024

    Magistrate Grants In Part Motions To Exclude Expert Testimony In FCA Kickback Suit

    OAKLAND, Calif.  — A California federal magistrate judge on Sept. 9 granted in part a health system’s motions to exclude expert testimony of relator’s witnesses in a qui tam suit alleging that the defendants violated the federal False Claims Act (FCA) and similar California law by paying kickbacks to certain physician groups, finding that certain portions of testimony should be excluded, including one witness’s opinion that a medical group was double billing.

  • September 10, 2024

    Judge Conditionally Dismisses Insureds’ Remediation Suit Following Settlement

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge entered an order of conditional dismissal in a coverage dispute over costs for remediating a riverbank after the insureds notified the judge that they had reached a settlement with their umbrella liability insurer.

  • September 09, 2024

    After Reconsideration, Judge Says Court Erred When It Ruled In Insurer’s Favor

    LOS ANGELES — Granting insureds’ motion for reconsideration, a federal judge in California said the court erred when it granted an insurer’s motion for summary judgment as to insureds’ breach of contract claim, finding that the court cannot conclude as a matter of law that the insureds’ water damage loss is not covered by their policy.

  • September 06, 2024

    Panel: ‘Sound Reasons’ Exist Why Excess Insurers Should ‘Stay On The Sidelines’

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California appellate panel on Sept. 5 affirmed a lower court’s ruling in favor of two excess insurers in a private equity management firm insured’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit, finding that “there are sound policy reasons why the excess insurers should stay on the sidelines” of the professional liability coverage dispute.

  • September 03, 2024

    California Federal Judge Continues Jury Trial In Contamination Suit

    RIVERSIDE, Calif. — A California federal judge continued a jury trial in an environmental contamination coverage suit filed by an insured seeking coverage for groundwater contamination discovered at a local airport.