Mealey's Class Actions

  • October 06, 2025

    U.S. High Court Won’t Decide Nissan’s Question Regarding Class Members’ Standing

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 6 denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Nissan North America Inc. that asked the justices to decide a question left open in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez regarding when class members must show standing and whether a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) class may still be certified if “no one in the class has suffered or will suffer an Article III [of the U.S. Constitution] injury,”

  • October 06, 2025

    Judge: Retirees In PRT Challenge Have Standing But Didn’t State Claims

    BOSTON — Overruling objections from each party in a putative class action that is part of a wave of challenges to pension risk transfers (PRTs), a Massachusetts federal judge granted dismissal motions upon concluding that the plaintiff retirees narrowly have standing because of allegations that they “received an inferior financial benefit than that to which they were entitled” — but failed to state their claims.

  • October 06, 2025

    Partial Dismissal Granted To LinkedIn Over Claims Of Data Gathering, Sharing

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — LinkedIn Corp. partially succeeded in its motion to dismiss claims that it used a tracking pixel to intercept and share users’ personal data with third-party advertisers, with a California federal judge disposing of one claim under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and dismissing one of four putative class complaints in its entirety.

  • October 06, 2025

    Defendants Win Dismissal In 4 More ERISA Cases Over Use Of Forfeitures

    Case law continues to accumulate in the wave of putative Employee Retirement Income Security Act class suits challenging a common use of forfeited nonvested matching retirement contributions, with four recent additions to the majority of rulings granting dismissal motions.

  • October 03, 2025

    Judge Dismisses Case That Challenged ESOP’s Use Of Low-Earning Cash Buffer

    STATESVILLE, N.C. — Declining to adopt the reasoning of a contrary Employee Retirement Income Security Act ruling issued in a different district, a North Carolina federal judge granted dismissal of a putative class action that challenged the use of a cash buffer by an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP).

  • October 03, 2025

    Split Panel Says California Interest Law Not Preempted After High Court Vacatur

    SAN FRANCISCO — A split Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Oct. 2 said that it cannot overrule its own precedent holding that the National Bank Act (NBA) does not preempt a California state law requiring a minimum 2% interest on certain mortgage escrow accounts and affirmed a more than $9 million judgment in favor of a class of borrowers, while a dissenting judge said the precedent at issue was “‘effectively overruled’” by the U.S. Supreme Court.

  • October 03, 2025

    Some Subclasses Certified In Accellion Privacy Suit; Some Expert Opinions Struck

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — The plaintiffs in a consolidated class action over the hacking of software created by Accellion Inc. saw some of their expert’s testimony stricken for his lack of experience by a California federal judge who also partly granted the plaintiffs’ motion to certify several subclasses related to Accellion’s customers who were affected by the data breach incidents.

  • October 02, 2025

    After Bench Trial, Judge Rules For 401(k) Plan Fiduciaries In Management Dispute

    MEMPHIS, Tenn. — Saying the Employee Retirement Income Security Act “demands prudence, not perfection,” a Tennessee federal judge entered judgment in favor of AutoZone Inc. and related defendants following a bench trial in the class action that was filed over several aspects of their management of a 401(k) plan.

  • October 02, 2025

    Ga. Federal Judge Grants, Denies Class Certification In Drinking Water PFAS Case

    ROME, Ga. — A federal judge in Georgia granted class certification to a group of Summerville, Ga., water and sewer subscribers and ratepayers as part of a proposed “Damages Class” for past rate increases caused by toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in their groundwater but denied certification for future increases and denied certification of a proposed “Injunction Class” in a lawsuit seeking damages for several chemical manufacturers’ involvement in the contamination.

  • October 02, 2025

    Deadlines Partially Stayed After Summary Judgment In Detainee Bond Denial Case

    TACOMA, Wash. — A federal judge in Washington issued a minute order on Oct. 1 partially granting a motion to stay deadlines in a class suit accusing federal officials of denying bond requests by the lead plaintiff and others being held at the Northwest Immigration and Customs Enforcement Processing Center (NWIPC) due to the federal government shutdown; the minute order was filed one day after a motion for partial summary judgment by one of the two detainee classes was granted.

  • October 02, 2025

    Split 5th Circuit Grants Rehearing En Banc In Challenging AEA Removals

    NEW ORLEANS — A divided Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals granted the federal government’s petition for rehearing en banc after a divided panel blocked the federal government’s removal from the United States under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) of three named individuals and the putative class they seek to represent who are all alleged by the government to be Venezuelan nationals who are members of Tren de Aragua.

  • October 02, 2025

    $2M Settlement Of California Federal Wage-And-Hour Class Action Gets Final OK

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A federal magistrate judge in California granted final approval to a $2 million class action settlement to resolve long-running claims that the owners of facilities that supply forage products violated the California Labor Code and the California unfair competition law (UCL) by, among other things, failing to pay nonexempt employees minimum and overtime wages and failing to comply with rest and meal period requirements.

  • October 01, 2025

    Judge Nixes PFAS Carpet Case Against 3M, DuPont, Says Allegations Not ‘Adequate’

    MINNEAPOLIS — A federal judge in Minnesota on Sept. 30 dismissed a class action against the 3M Co., E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. and DuPont affiliates, ruling that the complaint “does not include adequate factual allegations” that the plaintiffs’ injuries were connected to the defendants’ alleged awareness of the health risks posed by stain-repellent products containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that the companies made and sold to carpet manufacturers and others.

  • October 01, 2025

    $15M Deal In Pipeline Securities Fraud Case Endorsed ‘Overwhelmingly,’ Class Says

    PHILADELPHIA — The lead plaintiffs in a long and winding securities fraud class action related to the construction of a hydraulic fracturing pipeline on Sept. 30 filed a reply brief in Pennsylvania federal court seeking final approval of a class action settlement for a cash payment of $15 million on grounds that the agreement has been “overwhelmingly endorsed by the Class.”

  • October 01, 2025

    Judgment Without Monetary Relief Wraps ERISA Suit Involving ESG Efforts

    FORT WORTH, Texas — Wrapping up a class action over environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations and the purported proxy voting activism of nonparty investment management firms, a Texas federal judge issued a Sept. 30 judgment denying monetary damages but awarding “equitable relief to ensure that Defendants and their investment managers act solely for the pecuniary benefit of the Plan and implement compliance measures to ensure fidelity to” Employee Retirement Income Security Act fiduciary standards.

  • October 01, 2025

    YouTube Settles Trump 1st Amendment ‘Censorship’ Suit For $24.5 Million

    OAKLAND, Calif. — Parties agreed to a $24.5 million settlement in a putative class action filed in 2021 by President Donald J. Trump, individuals and putative class members against YouTube LLC and Sundar Pichai, CEO of its parent company, alleging that the plaintiffs were “de-platformed or censored” by having their content removed from YouTube.

  • October 01, 2025

    Amazon Workers Who Sued Over Off-The-Clock Work Fail To Disqualify Counsel

    DENVER — Amazon.com Services LLC workers who brought a class complaint in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic alleging that they were wrongly denied pay for off-the-clock work before and after shifts, including long wait times for health screenings due to the pandemic, failed to show that Amazon’s counsel should be disqualified or that Amazon should be sanctioned, a federal judge in Colorado ruled.

  • October 01, 2025

    Class Suit Accuses Federal Government Of Unlawfully Pooling Citizens’ Data

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Federal government agencies and their heads are violating U.S. citizens’ privacy rights and opening millions to “massive cybersecurity risks” by creating centralized records systems at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, a Sept. 30 putative class complaint filed by the League of Women Voters (LWV) and others alleges.

  • October 01, 2025

    Property Owners Affected By Hurricanes Allege Scheme By Attorneys, Law Firms

    NEW ORLEANS — A complaint requesting class action status was brought against attorneys, law firms and a professional liability insurer in a Louisiana federal court, alleging that the attorneys committed legal malpractice and breach of contract by setting “up a scheme in an attempt to quickly settle thousands” of Hurricane Laura, Delta, Zeta and/or Ida cases and “collect an exorbitant fee” that they would all share.

  • September 30, 2025

    Unaccompanied Alien Children Class Certified, Injunction Granted In Removal Suit

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A class of unaccompanied alien children from Guatemala was granted certification and a preliminary injunction halting their removal by a federal judge in the District of Columbia who required the class to post a $1 nominal bond.

  • September 30, 2025

    $49.25M Settlement OK’d In College Baseball Coaches’ Conspiracy To Deny Pay Suit

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A federal judge in California granted final approval of a $49.25 million settlement for a class of college “volunteer” baseball coaches who accused the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and its member schools of conspiring to ensure they were paid nothing for what they said were full-time jobs.

  • September 30, 2025

    $350,000 Incentive Award Granted To 3rd Plaintiff In Decades-Long Bias Suit

    NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York agreed to a $350,000 incentive award for the final named plaintiff in a nearly three-decade-long race bias suit over teacher licensing requirements in New York City; the plaintiff had requested a $2.9 million award.

  • September 30, 2025

    New York Federal Judge Deepens Standing Split In Series Of PRT Challenges

    NEW YORK — Days after a different New York federal judge dismissed a similar pension risk transfer (PRT) complaint for lack of standing, a New York federal judge on Sept. 29 largely declined to dismiss a putative class case, ruling that retirees have standing because they sufficiently alleged that the PRT “created a substantial risk that Plaintiffs will not receive their benefits” and “diminished the value of Plaintiffs’ benefits.”

  • September 30, 2025

    Judge: Investors Failed To Link Stock Drop To Biotech Company’s Misstatements

    SAN DIEGO — A federal judge in California granted a biotechnology company and its subsidiary’s motion to dismiss a securities fraud class action brought by investors alleging that the companies provided misleading information during the company’s acquisition of the subsidiary, finding that the investors did not establish loss causation because they did not link any of the companies’ corrective disclosures to a prior misstatement.

  • September 30, 2025

    Privacy Suit Over Zillow’s Watched Videos Disclosure Dismissed At Parties’ Request

    SAN DIEGO — A federal judge in California dismissed without prejudice a putative privacy class action against Zillow Group Inc. for purportedly sharing the video-viewing history of users of its app and website after the plaintiffs and online real estate platform operator filed a joint motion and stipulation to dismiss.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Class Actions archive.