Wage & Hour

  • November 05, 2025

    Cracker Barrel Servers Turn To Justices On Collectives Limits

    The Ninth Circuit relied on a U.S. Supreme Court decision that is silent on federal courts' jurisdiction when it limited a collective to Cracker Barrel servers only from the state where a wage suit originated, the workers told the justices, asking them to weigh in.

  • November 05, 2025

    Mamdani's Win May Energize Sluggish NYC Anti-Bias Agency

    New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani made a campaign promise to significantly boost funding for the city agency tasked with combating workplace discrimination, a move experts said could revitalize a watchdog plagued by backlogs and staffing shortages.

  • November 04, 2025

    Calif. Justices Doubt 'Illegible' Arb. Pact Is Enforceable

    California Supreme Court justices Tuesday doubted that an employer's "illegible" arbitration agreement is enforceable, with multiple justices observing that it's impossible to read terms of the contract at issue, which had been photocopied so many times the words are blurry.

  • November 04, 2025

    Bimbo Bakeries Hit With Donning And Doffing Suit

    Bimbo Bakeries in Horsham, Pennsylvania, is facing a potential class action lawsuit alleging that the company failed to pay employees for the time it took them to gather equipment and get dressed for work, in violation of Pennsylvania's wage laws.

  • November 04, 2025

    Ice Cube, Co. Didn't Pay For Video Shoot Work, Suit Claims

    A video company and rapper Ice Cube failed to pay a crew member who worked briefly on one of the rapper's music videos, a lawsuit in California state court claims.

  • November 04, 2025

    Colo. Car Broker's Misclassification Shorted OT, Court Told

    An automotive broker company misclassified brokers as overtime-exempt under an exemption that applies only to outside sales workers, a former employee alleged in a proposed class and collective action in Colorado federal court.

  • November 04, 2025

    Papa John's Franchisee To Pay $2.1M In Wage Case

    A Papa John's franchisee will pay $2.1 million to nearly 3,000 workers to end an 8-year-old wage and hour suit claiming minimum wage and overtime violations, after an Idaho federal judge preliminarily approved the deal.

  • November 04, 2025

    Collective Cert. Denied In OT Row Under 6th Circ. Standard

    An Ohio energy company customer service representative failed to meet the Sixth Circuit's standard for collective certification, a federal judge ruled, denying her certification bid in her suit accusing the employer of failing to pay call center workers for the preshift work they performed.

  • November 03, 2025

    Justices Urged To Rethink Baseball's Antitrust Shield, Again

    Three baseball players have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to rehear their petition to stop major league organizations from restricting their salaries, noting another similar pending petition and saying the issue will persist until the justices undo baseball's exemption from antitrust laws.

  • November 03, 2025

    Frontier's Training Repayment Contract Illegal, Pilot Says

    A former Frontier Airlines pilot said he and other incoming pilots were forced to stay with the company for two years or pay a hefty price under an illegal noncompete agreement, which he learned when he quit after less than a year and Frontier demanded $44,000.

  • November 03, 2025

    Amazon Should Pay For Security Checks, Conn. Justices Told

    Amazon must pay Connecticut warehouse workers for time spent waiting for and undergoing security screenings because state wage and hour laws contain unique "hours worked" definitions that do not appear in the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the employees' lawyer told the Connecticut Supreme Court on Monday.

  • November 03, 2025

    Firefighters Say Ariz. City Misused OT Exemption To Cut Costs

    A group of firefighters for the city of Mesa, Arizona, told a federal court that almost all the work they performed during ambulance shifts did not involve fire protection activities, arguing their wage suit should proceed because they did not fall under an overtime exemption for such activities.

  • November 03, 2025

    Fisher Phillips Adds 4 Employment, Appellate Attys In Calif.

    Fisher Phillips announced Monday that it has added four attorneys in California to bolster its employment litigation and appellate practices, including the former leader of Kelley Drye & Warren LLP's Los Angeles office.

  • November 03, 2025

    Furniture Co. Owners Accused Of Dodging $2.4M Wage Verdict

    The owners of a high-end furniture and accessories business shuffled assets and real estate to avoid being subjected to a co-founder's $2.4 million judgment for unpaid wages, according to a lawsuit the co-founder filed in Pennsylvania state court.

  • November 03, 2025

    NC Inn Fights To Preserve Counterclaims In Wage Suit

    A North Carolina inn's breach of contract and negligence counterclaims against two innkeepers are intertwined with the workers' wage and hour claims and not retaliatory, the inn said, urging a federal court to keep the counterclaims in place.

  • October 31, 2025

    Athletes Seeking Employee Status Renew Class Cert. Bid

    A group of college athletes, whose fight to be recognized as employees was revived by the Third Circuit last year, is urging a Pennsylvania federal court to certify them as a class, saying they meet the necessary criteria.

  • October 31, 2025

    Contracts Don't Clarify Arbitration Issue In Drivers' Wage Case

    A logistics company cannot arbitrate a wage suit by two drivers claiming they were misclassified as independent contractors, a New Jersey federal judge ruled, finding there are still open questions about whether the drivers or the company fall under arbitration agreements.

  • October 31, 2025

    Calif. Forecast: Justices To Weigh 'Illegible' Arbitration Pact

    In the coming week, attorneys should keep an eye out for California Supreme Court oral arguments dealing with whether an employer's "illegible" arbitration agreement is enforceable. Here's a look at that case and other labor and employment matters coming up in California.

  • October 31, 2025

    Wage & Hour Features Revisited: Equal Pay Tips, Circ. Rulings

    From compliance tips for equal pay audits and a Massachusetts pay transparency law to a breakdown of wage case decisions by the Third and Eleventh circuits, catch up on Law360 Employment Authority's wage and hour stories from October.

  • October 31, 2025

    Pregnancy Bias Drove Microsoft Worker's Firing, Suit Says

    A former Microsoft employee hit the tech giant with a discrimination suit in California state court, claiming she faced a barrage of micromanagement and criticism from a newly hostile boss when she returned from maternity leave and was terminated after announcing she would be having a second child.

  • October 31, 2025

    Costco, Cos. Cited For $868K In Calif. For Misclassification

    Costco, a delivery company and a trucking company are liable for more than $868,000 in citations for misclassifying drivers as independent contractors, the California Labor Commissioner's Office found.

  • October 31, 2025

    Wage Suit Against Property Management Co. Ends For Good

    A building and grounds maintenance worker ended his suit in California federal court accusing a property management company of failing to pay minimum wage and overtime after a deal that settled the remaining individual claims.

  • October 30, 2025

    Healthcare Nonprofit Hit With Clock-In Pay Suit

    A healthcare nonprofit stiffed workers on pay for off-the-clock work, including time spent booting up computers and logging in to software programs, two former employees alleged in a proposed class action filed in Ohio federal court.

  • October 30, 2025

    Trump-Era Wage Rule Crafters Are Past Rule Challengers

    The U.S. Department of Labor's leadership team now consists of at least two officials who previously represented challengers to Democratic-era wage and hour rules, signaling the Trump administration's potential approach to the same regulatory issues.

  • October 30, 2025

    Apple Retaliated Against Worker Over Mental Health, Suit Says

    Apple brushed off a former employee's mental and emotional health issues caused by the "intolerable workload" he faced and retaliated against him once he indicated he needed to take time off, the worker said in a complaint in California state court.

Expert Analysis

  • Federal Salary History Ban's Reach Is Limited

    Author Photo

    Though a newly effective Office of Personnel Management rule takes important steps by banning federal employers from considering job applicants' nonfederal salary histories, the rule's narrow applicability and overconfidence in the existing system's fairness will likely not end persistent pay inequities, says Margaret House at Kalijarvi Chuzi.

  • Tips For Employers As Courts Shift On Paid Leave Bias Suits

    Author Photo

    After several federal courts recently cited the U.S. Supreme Court's Muldrow decision — which held that job transfers could be discriminatory — in ruling that paid administrative leave may also constitute an adverse employment action, employers should carefully consider several points before suspending workers, says Tucker Camp at Foley & Lardner.

  • Employer Lessons From Mass. 'Bonus Not Wages' Ruling

    Author Photo

    In Nunez v. Syncsort, a Massachusetts state appeals court recently held that a terminated employee’s retention bonus did not count as wages under the state’s Wage Act, illustrating the nuanced ways “wages” are defined by state statutes and courts, say attorneys at Segal McCambridge.

  • Employment Verification Poses Unique Risks For Staffing Cos.

    Author Photo

    All employers face employee verification issues, but a survey of recent settlements with the U.S. Department of Justice's Immigrant and Employee Rights Section suggests that staffing companies' unique circumstances raise the chances they will be investigated and face substantial fines, says Eileen Scofield at Alston & Bird.

  • Amazon Holiday Pay Case Underscores Overtime Challenges

    Author Photo

    The recent Hamilton v. Amazon.com Services LLC decision in the Colorado Supreme Court underscores why employers must always consult applicable state law and regulations — in addition to federal law — when determining how to properly pay employees who work more than 40 hours in a workweek, says James Looby at Vedder Price.

  • What To Know About New Employment Laws In Fla.

    Author Photo

    Florida employers should familiarize themselves with recent state laws, and also federal legislation, on retirement benefits, teen labor and heat exposure, with special attention to prohibitions against minors performing dangerous tasks, as outlined in the Fair Labor Standards Act, say Katie Molloy and Cayla Page at Greenberg Traurig.

  • 5th Circ. DOL Tip Decision May Trigger Final 80/20 Rule Fight

    Author Photo

    A recent Fifth Circuit decision concerning a Labor Department rule that limits how often tipped employees can be assigned non-tip-producing duties could be challenged in either historically rule-friendly circuits or the Supreme Court, but either way it could shape the future of tipped work, says Kevin Johnson at Johnson Jackson.

  • Earned Wage Access Laws Form A Prickly Policy Patchwork

    Author Photo

    Conflicting earned wage access laws across the country, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's recently issued rule, mean providers must adopt a proactive compliance approach and adjust business models where needed, say attorneys at Sheppard Mullin.

  • 5th Circ. Shows Admin Rules Can Survive Court Post-Chevron

    Author Photo

    The Fifth Circuit's textual analysis of the Fair Labor Standards Act, contributing to its recent affirming of the U.S. Department of Labor’s authority to set an overtime exemption salary threshold, suggests administrative laws can survive post-Chevron challenges, say Jessi Thaller-Moran and Erin Barker at Brooks Pierce.

  • What 7th Circ. Collective Actions Ruling Means For Employers

    Author Photo

    With the Seventh Circuit’s recent Fair Labor Standards Act ruling in Vanegas v. Signet Builders, a majority of federal appellate courts that have addressed the jurisdictional scope of employee collective actions now follow the U.S. Supreme Court's limiting precedent, bolstering an employer defense in circuits that have yet to weigh in, say attorneys at Jackson Lewis.

  • Behind 3rd Circ. Ruling On College Athletes' FLSA Eligibility

    Author Photo

    The Third Circuit's decision that college athletes are not precluded from bringing a claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act raises key questions about the practical consequences of treating collegiate athletes as employees, such as Title IX equal pay claims and potential eligibility for all employment benefits, say attorneys at Debevoise.

  • What To Know About Ill. Employment Law Changes

    Author Photo

    Illinois employers should review their policies in light of a number of recent changes to state employment law, including amendments to the state’s Human Rights Act and modifications to the Day and Temporary Labor Services Act, say attorneys at Kilpatrick.

  • Court Denial Of $335M UFC Deal Sets Bold Antitrust Precedent

    Author Photo

    A Nevada federal court’s recent refusal to accept a $335 million deal between Ultimate Fighting Championship and a group of former fighters to settle claims of anticompetitive conduct was a rare decision that risks the floodgates opening on established antitrust case law, says Mohit Pasricha at Lawrence Stephens.