RICHMOND, Va. — The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s grant of summary judgment for an employer in a former employee’s suit alleging that she was terminated in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), finding that the former employee failed to show that there is a dispute regarding whether the employer’s stated reason for her termination was a pretext for disability discrimination.

LOS ANGELES — A California appellate panel on July 20 affirmed a lower court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of an insurer in an insured’s breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing lawsuit seeking coverage for theft by conversion of three African art pieces, agreeing with the lower court that the insured’s refusal to submit to an examination under oath as required by the personal articles insurance policy doomed his lawsuit.

PHILADELPHIA — A Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on July 20 affirmed a Delaware federal judge’s dismissal with prejudice of a breach of contract suit involving a licensing agreement for patented hand sanitizer and other skin-care products; the panel agreed with the judge that the plaintiff-appellant entity never received a required affirmative written communication that would allow it to bring infringement suits regarding the patents.

RICHMOND, Va. — The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on July 20 remanded for the district court to consider a commercial general liability insurer’s argument that its declaratory relief action was rendered moot by the settlement of an underlying lawsuit alleging that a nightclub insured misappropriated professional models’ likenesses and injured their professional reputations by posting their images online without their consent, noting that the question of mootness was raised by the insurer for the first time on appeal.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A pharmaceutical company’s filing of a petition with the District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to review the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s denial of a new drug application (NDA) deprived the district court of jurisdiction to hear the company’s argument that the FDA erred or to consider whether the employee who made the decision was improperly appointed, a federal judge in the District of Columbia held.

SEATTLE — A Washington federal judge on July 20 partially granted an insured’s motion for summary judgment on an insurer’s application of a policy exclusion in a dispute over coverage for water, mold and vermin damage to the insured’s personal items; however, the judge partially denied the motion as it applied to the cause of the damage because the record is not clear as to what actually caused the damage.

CINCINNATI — The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal for lack of standing of a landlord’s putative class action that alleged constitutional violations against the city of Detroit for purportedly unlawfully conditioning COVID-19 emergency rental assistance on compliance with the city’s municipal code, finding that the lower court correctly held that the landlord lacked standing because he applied for funding under the state’s control “and the State’s voluntary choice to apply the City’s policies severed the causal chain” between the city and the landlord.

ST. LOUIS — A Missouri gun owner lacks standing to sue over a pistol’s alleged defective features that can cause it to be inadvertently discharged because he admitted he has never experienced that or any other issues, an Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled, vacating a trial court’s class certification order and remanding with instructions to dismiss the case.