Mealey Publications™

TOP STORIES

Appellant Forfeited New Antedating Argument Before PTAB, Federal Circuit Says

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on March 9 affirmed final written decisions by the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), holding that the board did not abuse its discretion when it held that a technology company forfeited a new antedating argument during inter partes review (IPR) proceedings.

Judge Grants FDA Summary Judgment In Row Over Drug Exclusion From Bulk List

FORT WORTH, Texas — An outsourcing facility that neither compounds sodium thiosulfate “nor has a facility capable of doing so” lacks standing to challenge a decision by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to decline to add the drug to a list of bulk drug substances approved for compounding, a Texas federal judge ruled in granting summary judgment to the government (FarmaKeio Outsourcing, LLC v. United States Food And Drug Administration, et al., No. 2401040, N.D. Texas, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46434).

5th Circuit Affirms Attorney Fee Award Of Over $479,000 In ‘Frivolous’ FCA Suit

NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 6 affirmed a lower court’s order adopting a report and recommendation to award attorney fees of $479,656.22 to a health care company and related entities in a relator’s qui tam suit against them asserting violations of the False Claims Act (FCA) regarding disputes over the Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor program, finding that the lower court did not abuse its discretion in finding attorney fees “justified” due to the relator’s claims being “frivolous.”

Louisiana High Court Affirms Prescriptive Denial In Hurricane Coverage Dispute

NEW ORLEANS — The Louisiana Supreme Court on March 6 affirmed and remanded to a trial court an appellate court’s denial of an exception of prescription sought by the Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association (LIGA) as purported guarantor for a now-insolvent insurer in an insurance coverage dispute over purported damages from Hurricane Ida, finding that because the insurer made an unconditional payment on its insureds’ claims, which interrupted the prescriptive period, the insureds’ complaint was timely.

Court Lacked Admiralty Jurisdiction Over Yacht Owner’s Claims, 5th Circuit Affirms

NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower federal court’s ruling that granted subrogee insurers’ motion to dismiss a yacht owner’s petition seeking limitation of liability for damage caused by a fire and explosion under the Limitation of Liability Act, agreeing with insurers that the lower court lacked admiralty jurisdiction over the yacht owner’s claims.

High Court To Hear Air Force’s Challenge To Beach Waste Disposal Suit Dismissal

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court today granted a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by the U.S. Air Force seeking to resolve a circuit split and address questions about final, reviewable agency enforcement of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and compliance requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regarding a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling that reversed dismissal of a lawsuit filed by a Guam-based nonprofit corporation challenging an agency’s decision to engage in hazardous waste disposal at Tarague Beach.

Google, Epic Games Ask U.S. Supreme Court To Dismiss Fortnite Antitrust Dispute

WASHINGTON, D.C. — After filing a motion to modify an injunction in a California federal court, Epic Games Inc. and Google LLC and related entities (collectively, Google) on March 5 filed a joint stipulation of dismissal in the U.S. Supreme Court regarding Google’s petition seeking review of a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling affirming a lower court’s jury verdict and injunction in an antitrust suit filed against it by Epic Games Inc. over Google’s removal of Epic’s Fortnite game from the Google Play Store.

Jury Orders $75M In Damages For Removal Of University’s CMI

HARTFORD, Conn. — A federal jury in Connecticut found that the owner of an online platform that allows users to share educational resources with each other owes more than $75 million to a private university in the state after the jury agreed with claims that the web platform violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) thousands of times in its distribution of university contents.

Expedited Discovery Ordered Related To Nonrenewal Of FEMA Workers In RIF Suit

SAN FRANCISCO — The federal government defendants in a lawsuit by unions, groups and local governments challenging an executive order (EO) and memorandum implementing the EO that resulted in widespread layoffs of federal workers filed a 49-page Microsoft Excel document on March 5 in a federal court in California in response to an expedited discovery order issued two days earlier regarding “the individual(s) involved in the decisions regarding the renewal of” Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) cadre of on-call response/recovery (CORE) employees.

Judge Partly Dismisses ‘Natural’ Marketing Suit Against ‘ZzzQuil’ Maker

SAN DIEGO — A California federal judge on March 5 granted in part and denied in part a motion filed by The Procter & Gamble Co. (P&G) to dismiss a consumer’s putative class action accusing it of misleadingly marketing a sleep aid product as providing benefits “naturally” in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) because it is actually made with “synthesized” artificial ingredients.

Merck Waives Right To Respond To High Court Petition Over Untimely Gardasil Claims

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The manufacturer of the Gardasil vaccine on March 5 declined to respond to a petition for a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court filed by three women who claim that the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals erred in finding that the women must first file in the Vaccine Act compensation program before suing in a district court and contend that the addition of the Gardasil vaccine to the Vaccine Injury Table was unconstitutional.

LATEST NEWS

Liquor Liability Insurer, Insured Seek To Dismiss Coverage Suit Over Fatal Shooting
2nd Circuit Denies Mandamus Challenge To Recusal Denial In COVID Testing Fraud Row
Pet Food Class Action Over ‘No Preservatives’ Claim Partly Dismissed
PIP Claims Dismissed After Parties Stipulate To Dismissal In Coverage Dispute
Judge Enjoins Perplexity AI From Accessing Protected Areas Of Amazon.com
Litigation Financer May Enforce $13M Award After Albanian Entities Default
Appellant Forfeited New Antedating Argument Before PTAB, Federal Circuit Says
No Coverage Owed For Oil Spill Remediation Costs, Federal Judge Determines
CPAP MDL Judge Won’t Reopen Case For Man Who Says He Didn’t Get Court’s Notices
Prohibited Transaction Claims Survive In ERISA Suit Over Prescription Costs
Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage For Contaminated Sugar, Insurer Maintains
Boat Owner Files Class Action Over Raw Sewage Discharge Into Potomac River
Judge Denies Insured’s Summary Judgment Motion In Medicaid Fraud Coverage Dispute
Alaska High Court Vacates Attorney Fees Award, Finding Insufficient Evidence
Georgia Panel Reverses $345M Judgment Against Insurers In Sexual Abuse Coverage Suit
Another Michigan Municipality Sues PFAS Makers Seeking Damages For Water Pollution
U.S. Supreme Court Dismisses Google, Epic Fortnite Antitrust Dispute
Judge Denies Cross-Motions For Summary Judgment In Defect Coverage Dispute
Ohio Parties Debate Whether Court Should Have Reviewed Asbestos Ruling
Plaintiff/Defense Experts Testifying Since Jan. 1, 2002
Florida $20M Asbestos-Talc Verdict Stands As Judge Denies Posttrial Motions
New Jersey Judge Won’t Stay Beasley Allen Talc Disqualification
Government Seeks Review Of Order On Expert Admissibility In Camp Lejeune Case
Ill. Federal Judge Certifies Question On ECPA’s Crime-Tort Exception To 7th Circuit
No Coverage For Suit Arising From Insured’s Alleged Toxic Hair Products, Judge Says
Florida Judge: No Jurisdiction Over PTI Defendants In Asbestos Case
Insurers Say Avon Debtors’ Bankruptcy Plan Does Not Moot Their Appeal
Split Nevada Supreme Court Affirms Fee Award After Car Crash Judgment
Panel Says Pesticide Was Product Of Insured, Affirms District Court’s Ruling
Pa. Federal Judge Finds Economic Expert Testimony Allowed In Slip-And-Fall Case