Magistrate: Plaintiffs Must Defend Talc MDL Viability After Experts’ Withdrawal
TRENTON, N.J. — Ovarian cancer plaintiffs in the federal multidistrict litigation must show why all of the cases in the action should not be dismissed for failure to produce admissible expert specific causation testimony, a magistrate judge said in an order to show cause.
State High Court: Duty To Defend Is Not Negated When Insured Enables Trafficking
PHILADELPHIA — Answering a certified question from the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that neither an insurer’s duty to defend nor its duty to indemnify is abrogated on the basis of public policy when the insured is purported to have enabled or profited from sex trafficking.
Panel: Appellants Failed To Show Professional Liability Insurer Acted In Bad Faith
SALT LAKE CITY — The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower federal court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of a professional liability insurer on the remaining bad faith claim in a coverage dispute over a medical malpractice action arising from a surgical liposuction procedure that resulted in a patient’s death, finding that the clinic insured and its assignee have failed to identify evidence demonstrating that the insurer acted in bad faith (Hal Jenkins, et al. v. Prime Insurance, Co., et al., No. 25-4064, 10th Cir., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 21595).
New Jersey High Court Affirms Appeals Court Ruling Vacating Arbitration Orders
TRENTON, N.J. — Affirming an appellate court’s judgment “substantially for the reasons expressed” in the appellate court opinion, a unanimous New Jersey Supreme Court upheld the ruling reversing and vacating a lower court’s orders compelling arbitration in Allstate’s personal injury protection (PIP) suit against medical practices and physicians under the New Jersey Insurance Fraud Prevention Act (the Fraud Act or IFPA) and the New Jersey Anti-Racketeering Act (RICO).
2nd Circuit: Sculptor Should Have Found Alleged Infringement Of Snake Piece
NEW YORK — An artist who created a Styrofoam sculpture of a snake for an Italian adult film star and politician should have discovered the sculpture’s use in another artist’s works featuring the pornographic actress created in the late 1980s and early 1990s long before the filing of a 2021 suit, a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found, upholding a New York federal judge’s finding that the plaintiff-appellant’s claims were time-barred.
In Another PRT Appeal, DOL Again Urges Reversal Of Standing Finding
NEW YORK — Making the same key arguments it did in January in a similar interlocutory appeal, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) filed an amicus curiae brief urging the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to reverse a ruling that retirees had standing to file a putative class lawsuit that is part of a much-watched string of pension risk transfer (PRT) challenges; among other things, the retirees generally allege that the use of offshore captive reinsurers makes the insurers now responsible for paying their annuities more likely to fall short of their obligations.
Judge Enforces Award Worth More Than $1B Against South Sudan And Its Bank
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A District of Columbia federal judge on July 23 granted a Qatari bank’s motion for default judgment against the Republic of South Sudan and summary judgment against its state-owned bank, the Bank of South Sudan (BOSS), and enforced an International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) arbitral award against them worth more than $1 billion for defaulting on a roughly $700 million loan, rebuffing BOSS’s arguments opposing enforcement based on “vague allegations of corruption.”
Judge: Statute Of Limitations Bars Assignee’s Recovery Of Asbestos Losses
NEW YORK — A New York federal magistrate judge granted summary judgment in favor of a U.K.-based reinsurer after determining that the statute of limitations on an assignee’s reinsurance billing claims began in October 2001 when the reinsurer sent a letter denying the validity of the claims, rendering the assignee’s September 2023 demand for $403,748.42 time-barred.
Parties Debate How Pilot Cases Should Proceed In Depo-Provera MDL After Settlement
PENSACOLA, Fla. — The manufacturers of Depo-Provera, a long-lasting injectable contraceptive that allegedly caused women to develop intracranial meningiomas, a type of brain tumor, recommended three cases to serve as replacement pilot cases in the multidistrict litigation in a Florida federal court after the parties have reached a settlement agreement to resolve all cases that “meet the eligibility criteria agreed to by the Parties”; the women whose cases were suggested responded with varying degrees of opposition to the designation.
3rd Circuit Vacates Certification Of Third-Party Payers Class In Avandia MDL
PHILADELPHIA — The Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on July 21 vacated the certification of a class of third-party payers (TPPs) who paid for prescriptions for Avandia after finding that the statistical evidence presented in the district court to prove that alleged fraud by GlaxoSmithKline LLC (GSK) caused them to pay more for diabetes drug showed proof of correlation but failed to meet the appropriate causation standard.
Homeowners Insurer Was Required To Replace Only Damaged Siding, Judge Says
PHILADELPHIA — A Pennsylvania federal judge granted summary judgment in favor of a homeowners insurer on breach of contract and bad faith claims after determining that the insurer was required to replace only damaged aluminum siding on the insureds’ home as long as it was “substantially similar” to the damaged siding.