Mealey Publications™
TOP STORIES
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California issued a tentative ruling approving an $8 million class global settlement to be paid by a law firm after its network was breached and the personal identifiable information (PII) of more than 630,000 individuals was potentially accessed but questioned the specifics of the settlement terms and indicated that attorney fees were still being reviewed, according to civil minutes.
SALEM, Ore. — Protections from disclosure provided by an Oregon statute and evidentiary rule to communications between a domestic abuse victim and a qualified advocate also encompass any records related to services provided to the victim even if they do not specifically include confidential communications, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled, granting a women’s services provider’s petition for mandamus relief from a trial court’s order requiring it to provide a victim’s telephone and financial records.
FRANKFORT, Ky. — The Kentucky Court of Appeals reversed a decision by the Kentucky Workers’ Compensation Board and instructed the board to remand the dispute to an administrative law judge to determine which of two insurers should provide coverage to a workers’ compensation claimant who developed mesothelioma as a result of asbestos exposure while working at a Kentucky high school that contained asbestos.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Nov. 12 granted the federal government’s motion for divided argument in a case in which petitioners seek reversal of a lower court ruling that held that the Surface Transportation Board (STB) failed to adequately examine the risk of wildfires and the impact on groundwater posed by the construction of a proposed rail line in Utah that would carry products related to hydraulic fracturing to and from the shale formation in the Uinta Basin. However, the Supreme Court denied a motion for divided argument filed by the respondent. The Court did not elaborate on its decision.
STATESVILLE, N.C. — An upcoming trial over allegations that a woman suffered post-surgical complications following spinal surgery that included a FiberCel product has been canceled after the parties told a North Carolina federal court on Nov. 11 that a settlement has been reached.
NEW YORK — Arguments made by plaintiffs in the acetaminophen autism spectrum disorder-attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ASD-ADHD) multidistrict litigation appealing a decision to exclude their expert witnesses “would transform the trial court’s role” in determining admissibility under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (JJCI) and retailers of acetaminophen argue in a brief before the Second Circuit Court U.S. Court of Appeals.
MARSHALL, Texas — A federal judge in Texas on Nov. 8 denied a defendant hotel chain company’s motion to stay a patent infringement case involving room key technology while a Virginia federal judge considers a related patent infringement case, holding that most applicable factors weigh against granting the stay.
BOSTON — The First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Nov. 8 affirmed a Massachusetts federal court’s order of final judgment in favor of a commercial general liability insurer and two intervenor plaintiffs in a declaratory judgment lawsuit in which the insurer alleged that it owed a contractor and his two construction companies no duty to defend against lawsuits accusing them of breach of contract in connection with construction defects at an apartment complex in New Jersey, focusing on the policy’s “your work” exclusion in finding that coverage is barred.
FRESNO, Calif. — A federal magistrate judge in California granted final approval of a $5.5 million settlement between California workers and Amazon.com Services LLC, ending two cases in which the workers allege that they were denied pay for time spent undergoing COVID-19 symptom screenings before their shifts.
TAMPA, Fla. — A federal magistrate judge in Florida recommended the award of attorney fees to an online sports memorabilia store after a federal judge granted the store’s motion for summary judgment in its favor on claims brought against it by a photography company that accused it of copyright infringement by selling prints of photos of horse races.
NEW YORK — Two media outlets have not established that the removal of copyright management information (CMI) from news stories without corresponding dissemination of the works constitutes an injury or that an artificial intelligence is likely to reproduce the works verbatim, a federal judge in New York said in dismissing the outlets’ lawsuit on Nov. 7 for lack of standing.