WASHINGTON, D.C. — The federal government filed two applications with the U.S. Supreme Court asking the justices to stay orders issued in two putative class lawsuits that postpone the termination of temporary protected status (TPS) for individuals from Syria and Haiti; in the latest application filed March 11 and concerning individuals from Haiti, the government argues, referencing earlier rulings by the high court for the government concerning a similar case over Venezuela, that “[l]ower courts should be guided by this Court’s conclusions that the government was likely to succeed on the merits,” but instead “stop-and-start litigation over TPS terminations has become endemic.”

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on March 11 reversed an Iowa federal judge’s finding that claims of a patent describing a type of crop harvesting tool were invalid as indefinite; the panel held that the patent specification’s reference to a commercially available controller with logic circuitry constituted sufficient corresponding structure without the disclosure of an algorithm.

PHILADELPHIA — The U.S. Department of Justice on March 11 announced that Aetna Inc. has agreed to pay $117,700,000 to settle a relator’s qui tam suit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania alleging that Aetna and related entities violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by submitting inaccurate diagnosis codes for Aetna members enrolled in its Medicare Advantage plan to increase payments from Medicare.

NEW ORLEANS —The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 10 affirmed a lower federal court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of an insurer and denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in their lawsuit alleging that Allstate violated the Texas Insurance Code by charging its longstanding customers higher premiums than new customers for materially identical automobile insurance coverage, agreeing with the lower court that the filed-rate doctrine bars the action because the plaintiffs inherently challenge the reasonableness of the filed insurance rates that were reviewed by the Texas Department of Insurance.

NEW YORK —  The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 10 vacated and remanded a lower court ruling granting GEICO summary judgment on its declaratory judgment, common-law fraud and violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) claims against acupuncture practices and related individuals (collectively, acupuncturists), resulting in a $6,616,142.68 damages award for GEICO, finding that the ruling was based on an inaccurate determination that a health care provider that “improperly buys patient referrals” cannot receive no-fault reimbursements.

NEW ORLEANS — A partially divided Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel affirmed a trial court’s certification of only one subclass out of several proposed classes and subclasses in a case by workers who accuse United Airlines Inc. of discrimination by failing to provide religious and medical accommodations, finding no abuse of discretion in the certification only of employees who sought an accommodation due to religious beliefs and were accommodated with unpaid leave.

FORT MYERS, Fla. — A federal magistrate judge in Florida on March 10 granted an insurer’s unopposed motion for summary judgment in its insureds’ breach of contract lawsuit seeking coverage for Hurricane Ian flood damage, holding that the “simple and unforgiving” math indicates that the insureds failed to file their suit within the one-year jurisdictional deadline and failed to submit a sworn proof of loss.

SAN FRANCISCO — A woman’s California unfair competition law (UCL) action alleging that interactions with ChatGPT led to a murder-suicide threatens to waste court resources and produce piecemeal litigation duplicative of a recently consolidated state court action, OpenAI entities say in a March 10 motion urging the federal court to dismiss the case or stay it while the state court suit proceeds.