9th Circuit Affirms Sherman Act, UCL Rulings In Epic’s Antitrust Suit Against Apple

Attached Documents

• Opinion
• Epic’s reply and cross-response
• Apple’s response and cross-appellant brief
• Epic’s appellant brief
• September 2021 ruling
• District Court judgment
• Permanent injunction ruling
• October 2020 ruling
• TRO ruling
• Apple’s answer and counterclaims
• Epic’s complaint
• States’ brief
• Microsoft’s brief
• AAI’s brief
• Public Citizen’s brief
• CFAD’s brief
• CSAL’s brief
• 14 professors’ brief
• 38 professors’ brief
• United States’ brief
• APF’s brief
• ACT’s brief
• National security officials and scholars’ brief
• CJAC’s brief
• WLF’s brief
• CCIA’s brief
• COP’s brief
• ICLE’s brief
• California’s brief
• Six law and economics scholars’ brief
• ITIF’s brief
• Aviram and Ross’s brief
• CCPL’s brief
• Roblox’s brief
• Enforcers’ brief
• Law and business professors’ brief
• UCL practitioners and scholars’ brief