( July 28, 2026, 3:37 PM EDT) -- DETROIT — A Michigan appellate court on July 24 affirmed a lower court order clarifying its ruling on the insurer’s rescission of the policy and its application to personal injury protection (PIP) obligations, finding that the insurer’s challenge to a $250,000 limit on allowable-expense coverage was not preserved for appeal because the insurer’s complaint sought rescission only and did not seek a declaration regarding coverage limits....