Mealey's Artificial Intelligence

  • July 22, 2025

    Judge Finds For OpenAI In Suit Over Open AI Trademark

    SAN FRANCISCO — While both companies in a trademark dispute over the “Open AI” mark offered artificial intelligence products, it was OpenAI Inc. that commercialized and advertised its products and whose mark acquired a secondary meaning, a federal judge in California said in granting the company summary judgment on July 21.

  • July 22, 2025

    Bankruptcy Judge Imposes $5,500 Sanction For Fake AI Cites

    CHICAGO — A federal bankruptcy judge in Illinois imposed a $5,500 sanction jointly and severally on an attorney and his firm for the use of artificial intelligence that led to a filing with fake citations, saying any attorney that is not aware of the dangers of using the technology at this point is “living in a cloud” and warning that future punishment will not be so light.

  • July 22, 2025

    Microsoft, GitHub Say Coders Lack Injury, Identicality In AI Appeal

    OAKLAND, Calif. — Coders have not shown that artificial intelligences produce code identical to their own, and interpreting federal law to cover works that merely resemble a copyrighted work would produce “staggering” results, Microsoft Corp. and online code platform GitHub told the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a response brief.

  • July 21, 2025

    Judge Tosses AI Patent Inventorship Claims For Lack Of Jurisdiction

    CHICAGO — An Illinois federal judge dismissed an artificial intelligence (AI) data scientist’s complaint against his former employer, an industrial supplier, seeking the invalidation of patents for which he claimed to be the inventor, noting that the scientist appeared to cite a nonexistent subsection of the Patent Act and sought relief that was not possible.

  • July 18, 2025

    Media Companies Appeal Whether AI MDL Required Revisiting DMCA Dismissal

    NEW YORK — Two media companies filed a notice that they will ask the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to review a ruling dismissing a Digital Millennium Copyright Act claim against OpenAI Inc. and others as well as whether creation of a multidistrict litigation governing artificial intelligence copyright suits warranted reconsideration of the opinion.

  • July 18, 2025

    Judge Certifies AI Class, Wants Response To Fair Use Appeal Motion

    SAN FRANCISCO — In a pair of developments, a California federal judge on July 17 granted a class certification motion in an artificial intelligence copyright suit involving pirated works, saying “It will be straightforward to prove the classwide wrong done” and the case is the exact type that benefits from representative litigation.  In an earlier ruling the judge asked for a response to Anthropic PBC’s motion for reconsideration or an interlocutory appeal of a ruling on the company’s fair use arguments.

  • July 17, 2025

    Judge Says AI Photo Analysis Patent Not Abstract Per Alice Test

    WILMINGTON, Del. — A Delaware federal judge rejected a defendant artificial intelligence company’s argument that the machine learning patents it is accused of infringing are invalid as abstract, agreeing with the insurance company patent holder that “the patents recite the patent-eligible arrangement of two independently trained classifiers to analyze property characteristics and conditions.”

  • July 17, 2025

    Immigration Lawyer Hit With $1,000 Sanction For Fake AI Quotes

    ALBANY, N.Y.  — A federal judge in New York imposed a $1,000 sanction on an attorney for including fake quotes generated by artificial intelligence in a brief in an immigration case, crediting the attorney for taking responsibility but ultimately faulting him for not responding sooner.

  • July 16, 2025

    Newly Amended MosaicML Copyright Claims Lack Specifics, Companies Say

    SAN FRANCISCO — Plaintiffs in a recently amended action involving artificial intelligence copyright claims make conclusory allegations but never actually link the training of the models to copyrighted works or the plaintiffs’ own works, two companies responsible for training large language models tell a federal judge in California in seeking dismissal of the action.

  • July 15, 2025

    Judge: Fair Use Protects Anthropic’s Use Of Copyrighted Works

    SAN FRANCISCO — The use of authors’ copyrighted works for training the large language models behind Anthropic PBC’s artificial intelligence was transformative and is akin to schooling children and constitutes fair use, leaving only allegations that the company pirated copies for inclusion in a digital library, a federal judge in California said in largely granting summary judgment to Anthropic.

  • July 15, 2025

    Family: AI Output Speech Questions Interesting, But Not Appeal Worthy

    ORLANDO, Fla. — First Amendment questions surrounding artificial intelligence outputs may be “controversial, important, or potentially influential for courts” but do little to further negligence and wrongful death litigation tying a child’s suicide to use of specially created AI characters and do not rise to the level requiring interlocutory appeal, a family told a federal judge in Florida in opposing immediate appeal on a ruling covering the First Amendment and aiding and abetting claims.

  • July 15, 2025

    ‘Sheer Number’ Of AI-Faked Cites Noted In Defense Fee Declaration In Disability Case

    SANTA ANA, Calif. — In a July 14 defense fee declaration submitted at the direction of a California federal judge who imposed sanctions on a plaintiffs’ attorney for faked citations attributed to artificial intelligence, a disability insurer’s attorney said, “The sheer number of non-existent cases . . . was exponentially more than we have identified in any other cases discussing AI-generated and/or hallucinated cases.”

  • July 15, 2025

    Independent Music Artist Sues AI Music Companies Over Copyright

    In a pair of class lawsuits filed in federal courts in Massachusetts and New York, a country music artist and his recording company claim that artificial intelligence companies illegally copied his and other independent artists’ works, bypassing the type of licensing deals on which artists like himself rely.

  • July 15, 2025

    Class Says OpenAI, Others Stole Copyrighted Works To Train AI

    SAN FRANCISCO — Various OpenAI Inc. entities created their artificial intelligence ChatGPT by stealing copyrighted works from the internet rather than obtaining the material legally, plaintiffs allege in a class action filed in California federal court.

  • July 07, 2025

    COMMENTARY: Recent Developments In AI-Related Laws And Regulations In China

    By Lianjun Li and Jensen Chang

  • July 14, 2025

    Musk’s Business Emails Subject To Email Discovery In AI Suit, Magistrate Judge Says

    SAN FRANCISCO — Elon Musk’s business emails across the spectrum of companies where he serves as a high-level executive are not in the hands of third parties, and he is responsible for producing them in his suit against OpenAI Inc. and related entities, a federal magistrate judge in California said.

  • July 14, 2025

    Judge Won’t Reconsider Ruling Denying Leave To Amend In AI Case

    NEW YORK — News outlets will not get to amend their copyright action involving ChatGPT after a federal judge in New York determined that different rulings by other judges and the case’s inclusion in a recently created multidistrict litigation did not warrant revisiting denying leave to amend.

  • July 08, 2025

    Judge Imposes Sanctions For AI Cites In Lindell Election Case

    DENVER — A Colorado federal judge on July 7 imposed a pair of $3,000 sanctions against two defense attorneys after one of them submitted a “puzzlingly defiant” explanation for submission of a court document with 30 defective citations likely created by artificial intelligence.  Earlier a jury in the case awarded a man $444,500 on claims that My Pillow LLC founder Mike Lindell defamed him by accusing him of rigging the 2020 presidential election.

  • July 08, 2025

    Judge Won’t Consider Amicus Briefs In Deciding AI Speech Appeal Certification

    ORLANDO, Fla. — Amicus curiae briefs are unhelpful in determining whether to certify an immediate appeal on the question of whether artificial intelligence chatbot outputs are protected speech, a federal judge in Florida said in a docket-only order denying a quartet of motions for leave to file amicus briefs in a case alleging that use of Character.AI led to a child’s suicide.

  • July 03, 2025

    Georgia Court Imposes $2,500 Sanction After Fake Cites In Briefing

    MARRIETTA, Ga. — A “deeply troubled” Georgia Court of Appeals imposed a $2,500 frivolous motion penalty on an attorney in a divorce case after finding artificial intelligence possibly responsible for a fake cite constituting “a blatant misstatement of the law” on the availability of attorney fees in appeals on top of two fake cites in a court order and 12 fake cites in a response brief.

  • July 03, 2025

    California Federal Judge Sanctions Lawyer For AI-Faked Cites In Disability Case

    SANTA ANA, Calif. — A California federal judge imposed sanctions including a $500 payment on a plaintiff’s attorney who told the court that he “failed to scrutinize and oversee the preparation of” memoranda “filed with erroneous case citations that were invented by AI”; the breach of contract suit over termination of total disability benefits is headed toward a jury trial after the judge last month granted summary judgment for the insurer on a bad faith claim.

  • July 03, 2025

    Judge Finds For Meta On Fair Use, DMCA In AI Copyright Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — Plaintiffs in a copyright infringement suit over Meta Platforms Inc.’s artificial intelligence could potentially prevail on the theory that the technology threatens to so dilute the market for their works that fair use doesn’t protect the conduct, but the “half-hearted argument” presented by the plaintiffs falls short, a federal judge in California said in granting Meta summary judgment on fair use and Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) claims.

  • July 03, 2025

    Google Removes Defamation Action Targeting AI Overview

    MINNEAPOLIS — A Minnesota federal judge in a recently removed defamation suit claiming that Google LLC’s artificial intelligence product falsely named a solar company as a defendant in a Minnesota attorney general action against several other companies in the solar industry will hold a pretrial conference on July 23.

  • June 19, 2025

    COMMENTARY: Can AI Be Patented? Navigating Patent Subject Matter Eligibility

    By John H. Mutchler

  • June 10, 2025

    COMMENTARY: International Arbitration Experts Discuss The Efficiency Of Artificial Intelligence Tools In International Arbitration

    [Editor’s Note: Copyright © 2025, LexisNexis. All rights reserved.]