Court Properly Interpreted Noncumulation Clause, Insured Says In Opposition Brief

( April 28, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT) --  XE "Asbestos"  XE "Asbestos" PITTSBURGH — An insurer’s motion for reconsideration of a Pennsylvania federal judge’s ruling regarding the available limits of an insurer’s policies for underlying asbestos claims must be denied because the insurer failed to show that there was any manifest error of law or fact and because the judge properly interpreted a noncumulation clause, an insured says in response to the insurer’s motion....