-
July 11, 2025
TRENTON, N.J. — A federal judge in New Jersey dismissed a putative securities class action brought by pension funds against a medical device and technology company for alleged misstatements regarding efforts to address deficient manufacturing conditions at the company’s Boston facility, finding the pension funds did not plead “a strong inference of scienter.”
-
July 10, 2025
NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York gave final approval to a $13 million settlement between shareholders and the officers and the trustee of a consignment-to-retail used vehicle marketplace and its parent company in a class action that alleged the company and its officers misrepresented the company’s business model in violation of federal securities laws.
-
July 09, 2025
BROOKLYN, N.Y. — A federal magistrate judge in New York gave final approval to a settlement of a consolidated shareholder derivative action brought against current and former Peloton Interactive Inc. officers and directors that requires Peloton to make corporate governance enhancements regarding product safety.
-
July 03, 2025
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a federal judge’s ruling that the Securities and Exchange Commission acted in excess of its authority when it issued rule changes redefining proxy voting advice as a type of “solicitation,” finding that the SEC’s efforts to expand the definition “cannot be reconciled with the statutory text.”
-
July 03, 2025
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal judge in the District of Columbia granted the Securities and Exchange Commission’s motion for summary judgment and denied shareholder advocates’ motion for summary judgment in a case brought by the shareholder advocates alleging that recent final amendments to SEC Rule 14a-8 violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), finding that the SEC provided satisfactory justification under the APA for its amendments.
-
July 02, 2025
NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York granted a motion by a digital advertising and services technology company and certain directors and officers to dismiss a securities fraud class action alleging the company committed securities fraud when making material misrepresentations regarding its search advertising business that led the company’s stock price to drop, finding the investors didn’t plead actionable misstatements or facts supporting a strong inference of scienter.
-
July 01, 2025
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on June 30 denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by a former Tesla Inc. worker who asked the justices to consider whether an arbitration award may preclude relitigation of issues underlying a Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) claim.
-
June 30, 2025
NEW YORK — A panel of the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a case brought by an aerospace company that sought to void a stock purchase agreement (SPA) with a hedge fund because the hedge fund violated federal securities laws by not registering as a dealer, determining that under the terms of the SPA, the hedge fund did not have to be a registered dealer.
-
June 30, 2025
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on June 30 denied two crypto companies’ petition for a writ of certiorari for a suit brought against them by an investor alleging that they conspired to deflate the value of a crypto asset, which asked the court to determine whether the paired venue and nationwide service provisions of the Commodities Exchange Act (CEA) should be interpreted independently or as a whole.
-
June 30, 2025
NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York denied the Securities and Exchange Commission’s renewed request that the judge dissolve an injunction against crypto asset firm Ripple Labs Inc. and order that all but $50 million of the $125 million civil penalty Ripple was ordered to pay to the SEC be returned to the company, finding that the parties had not shown the exceptional circumstances necessary for their agreement to “outweigh the public interest or the administration of justice.”
-
June 30, 2025
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California on June 27 granted preliminary approval to a $38 million proposed settlement in a securities fraud class action against Bayer AG, the parent company of Monsanto Co., related to statements it made about Monsanto’s science-based trial defenses in Roundup litigation. The judge said the court will likely be able to finally approve the settlement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e)(2) as being “fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Class.”
-
June 30, 2025
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on June 30 granted certiorari to a petition filed by closed-end funds (CEFs) regarding whether a section of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (ICA) includes a private right of action.
-
June 26, 2025
SAN FRANCISCO — Hims & Hers Health Inc., a telehealth company that touted a collaboration with Novo Nordisk Inc. that would allow it to sell compounded semaglutide products, was hit with a securities fraud class action on June 25 by a shareholder who alleges that the stock value plummeted when Novo Nordisk ended the partnership.
-
June 25, 2025
LOS ANGELES — A federal judge in California gave final approval to a $7.25 million settlement between an electric vehicle startup, its predecessor and its CEO and investors who alleged that the companies provided false or misleading statements regarding a reverse merger that led the startup’s stock price to be artificially inflated.
-
June 19, 2025
PHILADELPHIA — A Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of a securities fraud case brought by the winning bidder at the forced sale of a company that provides language services against the company’s custodian and financial adviser for allegedly misleading statements, finding the bidder’s claims are time-barred.
-
June 18, 2025
SAN DIEGO — A federal judge in California granted final approval to a $10.5 million settlement in a case brought by shareholders against a biopharmaceutical company and certain executives alleging that misstatements they made about the company’s manufacturing possibilities and approval prospects for its lead product candidate unlawfully inflated the company’s stock price, which dropped after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration rejected the company’s license application for the product candidate.
-
June 17, 2025
NEW YORK — The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a renewed request that a federal judge in New York dissolve an injunction against crypto asset firm Ripple Labs Inc. and order that all but $50 million of the $125 million civil penalty Ripple was ordered to pay to the SEC be returned to the company, arguing that exceptional circumstances warrant a modification of the final judgment.
-
June 11, 2025
WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a reply brief in support of two cryptocurrency companies’ petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court for a suit brought against them by an investor alleging that they conspired to deflate the value of a crypto asset, the companies argue that the case is “an ideal vehicle” to determine whether the paired venue and nationwide service provisions of the Commodities Exchange Act (CEA) should be interpreted independently or as a whole, and note that the investor acknowledges the decades-long split among the federal circuit courts on this issue.
-
June 11, 2025
PASADENA, Calif. — A panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals denied a pension fund’s petition for rehearing en banc of the panel’s affirmation of dismissal of the fund’s class action alleging that a gaming company it invested in falsely inflated its share prices after finding that the fund needed to plead loss causation as part of its stock scheme claims.
-
June 10, 2025
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court decided not to grant certiorari to an investment officer and his investment firm asking the court to address questions regarding an award of disgorgement and the materiality of alleged misrepresentations under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940.
-
June 09, 2025
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Investors on June 6 waived their right to respond to an auditor’s petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the court to determine when the materiality requirement for securities fraud liability is satisfied.
-
June 05, 2025
GEORGETOWN, Del. — A Delaware chancellor granted in part and denied in part motions to dismiss filed by a company that designed self-driving robotaxis and several directors, as well as Amazon.com Inc., in a case brought by common stockholders alleging the directors breached their fiduciary duty during the company’s merger with Amazon, finding the shareholders adequately alleged more than half of the directors breached their fiduciary duty.
-
June 04, 2025
ATLANTA — A panel of the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court ruling dismissing a shareholder’s case against an automotive technology company and its founder and majority shareholder seeking to recover the founder and majority shareholder’s profits after the company repurchased shares of its stock on the open market, holding that federal securities statues and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s guidance prohibit such recovery.
-
June 04, 2025
SAN FRANCISCO — A group of investors urged the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals not to grant Wells Fargo & Co.’s petition for permission to appeal a California federal judge’s order granting class certification to the investors in their suit against Wells Fargo and certain executives alleging that news of the company’s practice of using fake interviews to give the impression of complying with internal diversity hiring practices led to a drop in stock value, arguing that the judge properly found that their out-of-pocket event study damages methodology satisfies the necessary requirements.
-
June 03, 2025
WASHINGTON, D.C. — An investment fund manager filed a notice of appeal of a federal judge’s dismissal of his suit challenging the Securities and Exchange Commission’s administrative law proceeding against him as unconstitutional and barred by res judicata; the judge found that the manager’s allegations failed for either lack of subject matter jurisdiction or failure to state a claim.